Robin,
Impossible was a bad choice of words, There are multiple arguments
that could allow for the fractional state, I should have said that the
relativistic solution is more likely because it side steps all the stability
arguments while fitting the Mills model of small "fast" hydrogen and the QED
theory of up conversion. If the cavity is mediating the process the hydrogen
states are stable and the orbital wavelength only appears shorter.
Best Regards
Fran
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 3:02 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Nickel has unique physical properties
In reply to Roarty, Francis X's message of Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:12:32 -0400:
Hi,
In short then, you believe it's impossible because
"The lowest orbital is kept away from the proton by an intervening stream of
virtual particles" ?
>Robin,
> IMHO all orbital ground states have a balance point between the
ambient ratio of short to long vacuum fluctuations (local curvature of space
time) from event horizons at one extreme to Casimir cavities at the other.
The lowest orbital is kept away from the proton by an intervening stream of
virtual particles similar to Puthoffs model keeping all orbitals from
decaying. That balance point can only appear to change if the curvature of
space time changes but being 3D creatures we remain unaware of temporal
orientation just as chalkboard figures are unaware of depth. I would extend
his model to suggest the particles represent a time axis stream intersecting
our spatial dimensions for only a brief instant we call the "present". From
the time axis perspective we are unaware of relativistic changes because our
atoms change 4D shape such that the vortex between the orbital and the
nucleus at its base remain a constant volume like Ron Mallets coffee analogy
- the faster you stir it
>the deeper the vortex gets but the radius of the spinning froth on the
coffee surface seems to get smaller proportional to the depth.
>
>I think Bourgoins 2006 paper estimating different radial velocities for the
different fractional quantum states fails to make it clear that those
velocities are invisible to that atoms themselves or nearby atoms and
strictly reflects a differential measurement between inertial frames -It is
actually decelerating relative to us outside the cavity because of the
broken isotropy of the Casimir plates making "us" somewhat equivalent to the
faster twin approaching C relative to the slower acceleration fields inside
the cavity.
>Best Regards
>Fran http://www.byzipp.com/hydrino/
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
>Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 4:26 PM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [Vo]:Nickel has unique physical properties
>
>Hi Fran,
>
>On your web site you state:
>
>"The hydrino as defined by Dr Randell Mills has a "real" fractional quantum
>state (sub-ground state) which is impossible."
>
>Why is it impossible in your opinion?
>
>(BTW private email to your email address is rejected for security reasons).
>
>Regards,
>
>Robin van Spaandonk
>
>http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html
