--- On Wed, 11/4/09, Kyle Mcallister <[email protected]> wrote:
> 2. An alternative possibility, which I sometimes wonder
> about, is to consider space itself (whatever space IS) as
> reaction mass. Can you 'dump' energy into it to satisfy kE
> in all frames? Can you set a 'piece of space' in motion
> equal and oppositely to yourself to satisfy both
> conservation of energy, and conservation of momentum? If so,
> why can't you reverse the process, and take back some of the
> energy you put into 'space' to move yourself relative to
> it?
(going somewhat off topic here)
Since the subject is a reactionless drive, let me propose the following concept
which I have tried over the years to construct various embodiments which have
presented a sort of Zen like riddle such as what is the sound of one hand
clapping? In electrical resonance energy in the form of electric and magnetic
fields oscillate between containers that hold this energy. For resonance to
manifest itself the container for the magnetic field is generally not
ferromagnetic but what is loosely termed "air core" which only implies the
abscence of ferromagnetic materials in the core volume of the coil. Likewise
the capacitor is a container that focuses the electric field component with a
certain volume of space. It is the motor principle that as a consequence of
lorentz force a current bearing element allowing an electric field to transport
charges will be deflected at right angles to the right angle relationship made
by the electric and magnetic fields themselves
as the causitive forces.
I may be a little lost here and need correction, but if the reaction force is
at right angles to the causitive force, is not this reactionless? But going on
here suppose that we wish to create some kind of reaction force BETWEEN those
electric and magnetic fields in resonance by allowing their (field)
construction in space to be identical and at right angles. This is a severe
limitation of possibilities, that right off the bat makes a 60 hz model totally
unfeasible, unless you have a military budget. But the proposition can be made
at frequencies near 500 hz using a large 70 lb induction coil, and a
cylindrical insulated water capacity that can fit inside the core volume of the
coil. For a single phase of resonance this proposition is apt to the Zen riddle
of the sound of one hand clapping. Here we are trying to secure a reaction
between two forces that themselves are the same movement of energy exchange
between electric and magnetic fields that
manifest themselves 90 degrees out of phase in time, so that when a full
electric field is available to make charge movement, the magnetic field needed
to make the reaction force has gone back to zero. Like the trig sin and cos
functions, each is the derivative of the other, meaning that the collapse and
re-emergence of an opposite polarity magnetic field across its zero point in
time corresponds to the peak of electric field storage, ect. What this
essentially means that every changing electric field has a corresponding
magnetic field 90 degrees out of phase in time. For the single phased spatial
field resonance example we can now find that the polarity of electric field
connections each produce two separate resonance points. There are actually
three possibilities that I found by actual experimentation. First the resonance
pt of the fields in isolation can be found. Upon insertion of the interior
capacity formerly in resonance into the core of the
resonating coil, the resonance ceases. In this circumstance the capacitor's
magnetic field will be either in agreement or disagreement with the magnetic
field of the exterior coil. The mutual inductance of the components changes the
X(L) value of the coil, which is the basis for how much capacity needs to be
used for the resonance pt.
Now quickly we see the need for having two of these spatially interacting
resonances that are functioning out of phase or timing with each other, so that
we can make a further modification or juxtapositioning of this E X B field
interaction. We wish now to match each four containers of fields in the new
manner so that in time two full electric and magnetic fields interact, while
the other container set will have combinations of both oscillations reaching
their zero point. I had began this work last winter but did not complete the
second interaction set. Now that I am on you tube I will be able to show
further things as they evolve. I use an 465 hz three phase car alternator that
generates 10,000 volts? in two stages of resonant rise of voltage.
Getting back to the theoretical possibilities here I see the need for
further modifications. Instead of a single plated interior capacity, an
interior ring of a non magnetic metal needs to be inserted. As the oscillating
charge movement made with the capacities now in series across this ring occur,
the lorentz deflection force on that charge movement; which is normally twice
the input frequency for a single phased spatial resonance reaction; now because
the EXB fields are in phase, the reaction output should be a DC pulsed current
on the ring.
The question on my mind what will happen if we mechanically rotate that ring? I
see that by hashing things out no reactionless vertical force should be seen on
that ring, but it provides for other theoretical amusements in the "what If"
category. The drift electron velocity in a material is a comparably low
velocity to the electrical impulse itself. It should be easy to rotate this
theoretical ring at the same velocity as the field imposed drift velocity. This
then should give two points of relative observation. If one is stationed on the
ring as a rotating observer, no current is measured on the ring cross section;
but to the external observer such current does exist. In fact come to think of
it I have an excellent demonstration that should be worthy of making a you-tube
video over. But first I would like to take a poll. In fact this demonstration
will make folks wonder if the wool is being pulled over their eyes. In fact
this demonstration SHOULD be
done because perhaps there are things here that have never before been seen,
such as the PROOF of magnetism being induced by macroscopic ferromagnetic spin.
In one slash I could take my sword of experimentation and kill the dragon of
remanant magnetism of the field rotor theory. But here is my challenge to those
who would take up this sword. How many people think that it is possible to have
a meter showing amperage into the rotating field of an alternator, but because
of the points of relativity between the rotating field and the non moving
observer arguments can be made to show that no current is actually going
through the field, because we show zero output on the alternator. We have
simply cancelled out the electron drift velocity by a rotationally opposite
slip ring to field rotor velocity. Of course to propose such a thing is
ludicrous since the impulse itself is near the speed of light. So what causes
this effect? The electromagnet field made by
the windings is being exactly cancelled out by the macroscopic effect of
spinning ferromagnetism by rotating it opposite to the drift velocity. Of
course now everyone agrees with me since I have explained it, so there again is
probably no need for a poll...
Sincerely Harvey D Norris
