Jones,

I believe you meant Robert Carroll, not Robert Forward.

--- On Tue, 11/17/09, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote:

From: Jones Beene <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [Vo]:New Energy Times News Flash: DoD Report Released
To: [email protected]
Date: Tuesday, November 17, 2009, 7:47 AM




 
 










From:
Horace Heffner  

   

"If rapid, explosive energy output can occur in one or several
modes, could LENR serve as a new high-energy-density explosive?" It is ironic 
isn't it?
 CF dismissed by DOE and the patent office, and yet potentially important
to DOD.   However, I think the potential for concern is very real.    

   

Yup. Absolutely. 

   

Going back to Robert
Forward we find the idea of “really cold fusion” … plus the
realization that bosons could be involved in LENR in a higher temp range than 
with
the Bose condensate (i.e. a “transient condensate” at ambient) …
and the realization that the very high effective pressure inside a metal matrix
is essentially the same effect as cryogenic confinement, in terms of limiting
degrees of freedom – plus realizing that palladium-hydride is
superconductive at low temperature … are any of these factors
synergistic? 

   

… it very likely
that near absolute zero the rate of reaction “could possibly” be
poised to go into a rapid chain-reaction mode, if there is a stable BEC and
extremely high loading. That is the scary part, especially if it were perfected
by our enemies first and the first evidence we see of it is Tel Aviv being
leveled, for instance. That scenario is likely one of many reasons why the
Israelis have been deeply involved in the R&D, and we probably only see the
tip of that “iceberg”. 

   

From time to time, there
have been divergent opinions expressed here on whether or not this military
aspect is actually already well-known to a few in the Pentagon, from a black
project perhaps (assuming it is real) – and then that secret knowledge is
what has translated down the food chain into what we see as the incredible
level of “official neglect” given to the whole field since 1989 …? 

   

IIRC - Jed has led the
chorus for the argument that goes something like this: our military bureaucracy
is really “not that smart” and there is no high-level conspiracy to
quash LENR – just basic ignorance. The bureaucrats could not keep it
secret, in any event.  

   

I hope that argument turns
out to be correct, but I suspect something more sinister. They cannot keep many
secrets, but there are a few that could be worth protecting at extraordinary
cost.  

   

Jones 

   

   

   

   







 

Reply via email to