so basically, london forces inside the protons?  rock on.

On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 1:13 AM, Mark Iverson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This just out at PhysOrg... (see at bottom of msg)
>
> What I find funny, in a sad kind of way, is the following statement:
>
> "So you have one set of data that tells you the mass-dependence picture 
> doesn't work and another
> that tells you the density-dependence picture doesn't work," Arrington 
> explained.
> "So, if both of these pictures are wrong, what's really going on?"
>
> And the experts dare say that fusion is IMPOSSIBLE under the conditions 
> present in a CF cell? This
> can ONLY be said if one knows everything about nuclear interactions, and 
> CLEARLY, they DON'T!
>
> -Mark
> ===========================================
>
> JLab experiment E03-103 made precise new measurements of the EMC effect in a 
> variety of light
> nuclei. The results indicate that the effect does not depend on nuclear mass 
> or density but rather
> on the microscopic structure of nuclei, usually neglected in high-energy 
> measurements. This result
> hinges on the unusual structure of 9Be. Most of the time, it is in a 
> configuration with two 4He-like
> clusters and an additional neutron orbiting around each other. The orbiting 
> clusters yield a large
> radius and an anomalously low average density similar to that of the much 
> less massive 3He. But the
> size of the EMC Effect in 9Be is much more similar to that of the denser 
> nucleus of 12C. This is
> probably because most nucleons are contained within the high local densities 
> of the clusters. The
> results suggest that the EMC effect may be entirely generated within these 
> small, high-density
> clusters, where densities can briefly approach those in a neutron star. 
> Credit: Image: Peter Mueller
> (Argonne National Lab)
>
>
> A recent experiment at the DOE's Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator 
> Facility has found that a
> proton's nearest neighbors in the nucleus of the atom may modify the proton's 
> internal structure.
>
> The result was published in the November 13 issue of the journal Physical 
> Review Letters.
>
> When comparing large nuclei to small nuclei, past measurements have shown a 
> clear difference in how
> the proton's constituent particles, called quarks, are distributed. This 
> difference is called the
> EMC Effect.
>
> [deletions...]
>
> "So you have one set of data that tells you the mass-dependence picture 
> doesn't work and another
> that tells you the density-dependence picture doesn't work," Arrington 
> explained. "So, if both of
> these pictures are wrong, what's really going on?"
>
> [deletions...]
>
> "We want to isolate the quark structure during the moment when the proton and 
> neutron are very close
> together. If we find a large effect in such a small and simple nucleus by 
> looking when the proton
> and neutron are closest together, it will demonstrate that the EMC effect 
> does not require a large,
> dense nucleus - it simply requires two nucleons coming into extremely close 
> contact," Arrington
> explained.
>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.425 / Virus Database: 270.14.73/2513 - Release Date: 11/19/09 
> 07:51:00
>
>

Reply via email to