-----Original Message-----
From: Horace Heffner 

> I think you need to read the SPAWAR articles.  SPAWAR detected triple
tracks deep the CR-39. They show the photos.  

Yes, my original post cited both the article and the image of triple tracks-
which I am merely hypothesizing comes from something other than what the
authors ascribe them to. I have read articles by them going back to the mid
nineties where they find a tiny amount of tritium, but AFAIK only recently
did they make this dreadfully incorrect leap of faith to include such a rare
reaction involving carbon fission. As best I can tell, they are apparently
unaware of the low cross-section problem.

> Such triple tracks in CR-39 are common when high energy neutrons are
present.

Nonsense, if you are talking about a small flux of fast neutrons ... or else
... to be diplomatic, let me change that to: can you please provide a
citation for this being a "common" occurrence with a very low flux of fast
neutrons. 

As best I can tell from what is available online, only a massively large
flux of fast neutrons would leave any detectable triple tracks in adjacent
film. This is due to the extremely low cross-section, and the extremely high
penetrating power of fast neutrons. A flux of fast neutrons, sufficient to
cause even one triple track in a single sub-mm layer of film - would seem to
be most undesirable - even deadly.

The infamous "Dead Graduate Student Problem" came to exemplify what hot
fusion practitioners thought about P&F's original announcement, and yet even
so- that was with no suspected tritium being involved (in 1989). If D+D
fusion generated heat, so the argument went -- the neutron flux should have
killed the Grad Student operating the cell... but later - the
rationalization was found that it was full helium fusion, and with very few
neutrons, so Grad Students are safe ... 

...but fast forward and now we find that the SPAWAR team wants to return to
that scenario made even worse via tritium ... and surely D+T fusion should
have nailed everyone in the entire SPAWAR lab, if even a few triple tracks
were seen. Of course, here we are not talking about excess heat - merely the
number of triple tracks observed (about 10 per every three day run it would
seem), and then calculating back from cross-section of carbon for fast
neutrons to the flux which should have been required to produce them. 

> It is a logical conclusion on their part that their co-deposition
experiment created enough T that DT reactions were detected. 

Horace, it could be logical that a few thousand DT reactions occurred, since
there was a tiny amount of tritium. What is not logical is that any of the
fast neutron would be stopped by carbon in a single layer of film. 

The problem that SPAWAR seems to dodge is statistical. They claim there are
only a few thousand tritium atoms, so that even if there is a complete
fusion of it all with deuterium, there are way too few fast neutrons; since
the probability of any of them being stopped in a single layer of CR-39 by a
carbon atom is beyond comprehension in a statistical sense, even in hundreds
of years. 

Plug in your own numbers. No, I have not done so, and am no expert - but
(self-appointed) expert in news groups say this claim is impossible. Even
the ones who are open minded about LENR will probably opine that the
cross-section is way, way too low for 3 triple tracks per day without a huge
and deadly flux. One remark claims that the SPAWAR authors appear to be
blithely unaware of the cross-section problem. Have you seen where they have
addressed it?

IOW, the bottom line seems to be that it would require such a high flux of
fast neutrons, that there would be extremely dangerous consequences for the
experimenters, who seem perfectly healthy. 

Unless there is something more to the story. What I now surmise is that:

1) They created bona fide LENR reactions, with some tritium 

2) they found a number of 'triple tracks' in a ratio of about 1:1000 with
the number of tritium atoms available

3) they looked for any possible explanation.

4) they chose a preposterously wrong explanation - pretty much by default,
since apparently it was the only one that they could fit into the
circumstances of having found tritium and triple tracks together.

Jones

Reply via email to