At 03:37 PM 12/16/2009, Hoyt A. Stearns Jr. wrote:
I'm on thin ice with that question, so all I can say is it is connected, but
not in the normal way.  All the battery energy is dissipated as heat, not
KE.

Well, Hoyt, you can get off the thin ice, I will ask you some generic questions that should not involve the violation of any enforceable NDA.

1. Do you understand how the device works, sufficiently that if Steorn were to disappear, you could reproduce it? Do you have documentation this, adequate to reproduce?

2. Do you know that it works, that there is excess energy in the system?

3. How do you know this? I'm not asking for specific, just a general comment that can later be compared with what becomes known. To put this question a different way, how much are you relying on your own experience and how much on what they have told you?

4. Is there a time limit on the NDA?

5. If you found what you believed to be fraud, would you be prohibited by the NDA from revealing this to the authorities? (If so, the NDA is itself illegal and unenforceable.)

6. Can you discuss what you have found with anyone, such as your own employees or counselors?

7. How the eff do you explain the really dumb demonstration, laden with hosts of obvious flaws? I have a theory, as you may have noticed. Other than that theory, the default idea seems to be that they are just plain dumb and incompetent. How would you explain that a bunch of incompetent people have ended up in control of this discovery with huge consequences?

8. Can you understand why we are Skeptical as Hell? Would it be rational for us to believe at this point that there was any significant possibility that there really is an over unity device here? Out of what is publicly known, can you give us a reason to think otherwise?

9. Suppose a possible investor were to consult with you. Before putting any money in and getting the information you have, could that investor purchase an indemnity from you, such that you would have to cover the investor's losses if there were fraud involved on the part of Steorn? After all, if the information is solid and has been confirmed by you, the indemnity would be easy money.

Reply via email to