Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:

> Reasonable, I'd say, if the 10W experiment looked like it had a prayer of
> being scalable.


10 W would already be a significant scale up, by a factor of ~10. If it
worked I am sure any larger size would work. Also, I know of no reason to
think it would not scale up. Kitamura has already scaled up substantially.



> If not, it would still be worth substantial continued support, depending on
> such things as the economics.


Substantial compared to what? Compared to what it costs to develop a new
shade of lipstick or to build yet another marginal shopping mall in an
overcrowded market in Atlanta?



> If one needs $100,000 worth of palladium to generate 10 W, it may be
> striking as a phenomenon, but not as a commercial product.


The nanoparticle approach uses less palladium than others. A nanoparticle
cold fusion device capable of practical levels of energy generation would
use no more palladium than an automobile catalytic converter.



> The priority at first should be exploring the science, WTF is happening in
> there? Without knowing, speculating about commercial applications is just
> that: speculating. Not engineering.


I think it is far beyond speculation. Also, many technologies in the past
were developed without a theoretical basis. I recently wrote to a
correspondent about this:

"Other technological revolutions in the past got underway and made
tremendous progress before a theoretical understanding was developed. That
has not happened often since 1945, but it is not out of the question. Look
at telegraphy, railroads, heat engines and incandescent lights. The
thermodynamics of heat engines (steam and internal combustion) was not
understood before 1870, and not fully understood until around 1910, but
tremendous progress was made before that. Melich says that much of nuclear
engineering and solid state and catalytic effects is still understood only
as an empirical model, not a theory. Medicine is largely empirical. 'Medical
science' is practically an oxymoron . . .

The importance of theory is overrated in the modern era, in my opinion."

- Jed

Reply via email to