Jones,
Your last reply was awesome; I thought I went over the top with that river
of time and different flow rates that we as 4D beings can't observe because
our perspective is linked to the flow rate. My animation wasn't very clear
but I was trying to take Ron Millets coffee analogy where the radius can be
stirred faster to contract the orbiting froth n the surface but the vortex
gets deeper into the coffee to keep a constant volume. The hydrino nucleus
is at the bottom of that vortex keeping the columbic barrier displaced in
time units instead of spatial units such that the energy or volume of the
vortex remains unchanged (Mills calls it a nonradiating transition).
[snip]
One further point which has not been addressed adequately is that there are
(or can be) two distinct geometries at work in an optimized LENR active
zone, which are an order of magnitude different in scale.
And it could very well be the case that optimized LENR demands both: the
Casimir cavity itself which is in the range of 2-10 nm (and can be called a
'defect' or fracture zone); and the other being the surrounding matrix
metal, with its interstitial cavity "pores" within the solid FCC crystal. I
recall seeing a paper by Mitchell Swartz where he mentions something to this
effect as being a necessary precondition, IIRC.
[/snip]
Yes I have considered both the cavity and the lattice minus the nuclei as
tributaries /bay and inland sea, but I wasn't sure how to breach this
subject, I have only been talking about the cavity and not defining where
the pressure accumulates in the lattice. I think the "sails" are formed by
the compact density of the nuclei in a lattice that form a "fleet of sails"
which normally relieve their pressure to open space at exterior surfaces
remaining isotropic. The other geometry you mention may be everything else
"behind the nuclear sails". the vortex formed behind the nuclei may be
responsible for restoring the energy per Puthoff and establishing the
orbital distance. The pressure is still slightly higher inside the solid
lattice but needs plate geometry to accumulate an inexhaustible supply and a
tiny cavity to form a permanent venturi of virtual particles. These
tributaries and lattice defects forming the bays into the cavity may be the
other geometry to which you refer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------
[snip]
Fran: The plate geometry has an equal and opposite "pressure" like
giant
sails that accumulate this pressure while the cavity represents a
small tear
that lets the increased pressure create a venturi..the "wind speed"
if you
will can exceed the nominal value of open space, and the hole is not
big
enough to exhaust the accumulated pressure.
I think this description works more accurately if you describe something
like a smaller cavity feeding a larger cavity in a back and forth sequential
pulsation. Palladium is FCC at ~390 pm. Pd atom radius is ~137 pm. This
leaves a cavity of up to ~120 pm diameter, as best I can tell. Since the
power law is cubic, the effective space difference between the matrix cavity
and the Casimir cavity is a ratio of at least 1000:1 if my assumptions are
correct.
One can imagine a very large "ZPE wind speed" pulsing atoms back and forth.
On every pulse, several hundred atoms may move in-and-out. Metaphorically,
they may 'breath in' ZPE in order to reduce the stress of this rapid kinetic
transfer. The frequency of the lattice is in the terahertz range, based on
blackbody assumptions, and if the average distance traveled were known, then
the start-stop speed could be modeled. Because the frequency is very high,
the rate of acceleration must also be at a power law over normal
expectation, which is what we have called "jerk" or "jounce" in the past
(see the snippet at the end). This would indicate, or at least be consistent
with, some kind of time-dilation between the local scale and that of the
Viewer.
[/snip]
I like "jounce" to define the rate of change in jerk and agree there is
certainly a good deal of spatial acceleration associated with catalytic
action but keep in mind this "motion" from the perspective of the reactant
atom inside the time stream of the cavity appears like time dilation to an
observer outside the cavity. So all your numbers and conjecture may be just
what we need to quantify the effect but keep in mind they will translate to
heat and time dilation while exiting the cavity. The venturi of a Casimir
cavity seems like a huge short cut compared to the luminal velocity of a
spaceship clawing a few degrees onto the time axis as a result of a
Pythagorean relationship between the rate of the time stream and the rate of
the ship, The venturi method directly alters the rate of the time stream
through the cavity as long as it doesn't exhaust the pressure built up by
the plates.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
On the math I think there should be a relationship between Bourgoins
equation for fractional states and the Casimir cavity with one conversion
factor for monatomic and a second conversion factor for diatomic. Perhaps a
step functions for diatomic because the covalent bond has to be broken
before translation while the monatomic is free to translate without change
in energy. This demonstrates a break in symmetry between diatomic and
monatomic translation into and out of the cavity.
Regards
Fran
