And it is unmitigated bovine scat. Another obfuscation. The claim is that the inductance will change in a CHANGING MAGNETIC FIELD not a steady state field. The dynamic field of the approaching rotor magnet induces a charge in the windings which will show on the meter as a changing inductance. All they have shown is that the RESISTANCE of the coil does not change in the windings immersed in a constant magnetic field.
They know damn good and well they are obfuscating. Several of us have tried to post comments on that video and none get approved. I am now convinced. It's a scam. Terry On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Esa Ruoho <[email protected]> wrote: > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VYGSdUdONpw > says "Addendum to our video "Steorn's Orbo Electromagnetic Interaction COP > greater than 1"" > > here's "a" transcript.. sorry if i made mistakes, i dont understand what > "aii" is.. > ---- > What we are going to do today is to address some of the concern made after > the last experiment, which is to know whether or not a change in the > inductance of the coils due to the magnets on the rotors, induced a changed, > in the current, through the coils. > > this is a coil, and we are measuring its inductance with this LCR meter so i > am connecting two kelvin probes to it. > and as you can read, on the LCR meter, its inductance is 306millihenry - now > i'm going to apply a strong magnetic field to the coil and as you can see, > its inductance has dropped to, about fourty microhenry. > -- next scene -- > connecting the coil to a dc power supply. > > the yellow trace on the scope is the current, and the blue trace is the > voltage across the coil, there's an offset on the current of 180 milliamps, > so that we can zoom on the trace, and the scale is 5 milliamps per division, > and the scale of the voltage is ten millivolts per division. > > and going to stop the oscilloscope, so we can read the values. there is > 184milliamps and 14.25 millivolts across the coil. i'm applying a strong > magnetic field to the coil, so i am changing the inductance of the coil. > going to run… and stop the oscilloscope. now the values are 184.4milliamps > and 14.26 millivolts. > > -- next scene -- > to summarize: the inductance of the coil before the application of the > permanent magnet, is 306 millihenry, and after the application of a > permanent magnet its 40 microhenry > > the energy stored in the inductor is half ali (??) squared > which before the application of the permanent magnet gives us 5.18 > millijoules, and after the application of the permanent magnet, gives us > 0.00068 millijoules, which is a variation of 99.9%. > > on the voltage and current, the voltage before the application of the PM is > 14.25 millivolts, after application of PM it's 14.26 millivolts, which gives > us a difference of 4.57 microvolts. > > on the current, the current before the application of PM is 184.1 milliamps, > after application of PM it's 184.45 milliamps, gives us a difference of > 355microamps. > > the variations in the voltage and current are insignificant and are within > the rate of measurement accurancy and in no way can account for the > significant change in the energy stored in the inductor. > >
