Correction: "that the effect is absent at say 8 or 12 MHz ?" in the example below.
Perhaps the easiest QM effect to play around with - for proving Frank's theory is electron tunneling. Intel uses this billions of times per second in its chips, which presumably operate at way over the threshold voltage; BUT there should be a strong preference in a testing situation at very low voltage (below threshold) for finding the "velocity of the transitional quantum state" at a preferred frequency for electron tunneling in any tunneling transitor, no? From: Jones Beene Very impressive video, Frank. However, I will have to admit that I still do not understand the significance of a "constant" for "the velocity of the transitional quantum state" - well enough to see how it should be useful. If there is real predictive value to ~megahertz-meter, for instance - would not that imply that a spatial preference exits - such as a plasma reactor which is say . 100 cm along its axis, and would have a resonance (for some quantum effect) at 10 MHz . and most importantly - that the effect would not be absent at say 8 or 12 MHz ? If there is such predictive value, wouldn't that imply that this could be easily tested in a new experiment, instead of trying to pick-and-choose among past results for which it does fit ? IOW - Have you ever made prior unrehearsed prediction and then done it with good results - to prove the point? Jones From: [email protected] Subject: [Vo]:radio interview..its is really good...take a minute to look at it. My last show was the number one on U tube. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ykCWaVcjSA Frank Znidarsic
