[I sent a version of this previously, that did not appear to go through.]

Abd ul-Rahman Lomax found the Encyclopedia Britannica article on fusion:

http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/421667/nuclear-fusion/259125/Cold-fusion-and-bubble-fusion

This is part of a larger article about fusion, which is pretty good. It is
written by Robert W. Conn, who is apparently the Dean of Engineering
Emeritus U. California at San Diego. Steve Krivit would probably be pleased
to hear fusion defined as:

"Fusion reactions constitute the fundamental energy source of stars,
including the Sun. The evolution of stars can be viewed as a passage through
various stages as thermonuclear reactions and nucleosynthesis cause
compositional changes over long time spans."

Here is the section on cold fusion and bubble fusion, which not so good:

"Cold fusion and bubble fusion

Two disputed fusion experiments merit mention. In 1989 two chemists, Martin
Fleischmann of the University of Utah and Stanley Pons of the University of
Southampton in England, announced that they had produced fusion reactions at
essentially room temperature. Their system consisted of electrolytic cells
containing heavy water(deuterium oxide, D2O) and palladium rods that
absorbed the deuterium from the heavy water. Efforts to give a theoretical
explanation of the results failed, as did worldwide efforts to reproduce the
claimed cold fusion.

In 2002 Rusi Taleyarkhan and colleagues at Purdue University in Lafayette,
Ind., claimed to have observed a statistically significant increase in
nuclear emissions of products of fusion reactions (neutrons and tritium)
during acoustic cavitation experiments with chilled deuterated (bombarded
with deuterium) acetone. Their experimental setup was based on the known
phenomenon of sonoluminescence. In sonoluminescence a gas bubble is imploded
with high-pressure sound waves. At the end of the implosion process, and for
a short time afterward, conditions of high density and temperature are
achieved that lead to light emission. By starting with larger,
millimetre-sized cavitations (bubbles) that had been deuterated in the
acetone liquid, the researchers claimed to have produced densities and
temperatures sufficient to induce fusion reactions just before the bubbles
broke up. As with cold fusion, most attempts to replicate their results have
failed."


The last sentence contradicts the first paragraph. Kind of sloppy. Also
factually incorrect.

I guess I would have to say that despite its many faults, the Wikipedia
article is better.

- Jed

Reply via email to