Lovely page!  Thanks, Harry!

JLN has done a really clear job of describing the effect, well enough
that it can be reproduced and fully analyzed, with, as far as I can see,
no hidden tricks.

Now, what can we say about his page?

First, he measures the inductance of the coil, and observes that it's
lower when the magnets are nearby.  OK, well and good; as I understand
it that's because the core is saturated and its permeability has hit the
skids.

Next, he shows the voltage, current, and power curves to
energize/deenergize the coil with and without the magnets present.  He
asserts, several times in a couple different ways:

> KEY 3 : The electrical power (Current * Voltage ) needed to energize the
> toroidal stator coil at the TDC position is EQUAL to the electrical
> power for the REF position and this is fully independant of the position
> of the magnet of the rotor Vs the toroidal stator coil. The electrical
> input power is fully decoupled from the output mechanical power.

Now it may not matter with regard to the final analysis of this motor
(which probably must depend on calorimetry), but it's interesting to
note that this several times repeated assertion is FALSE.  This can be
seen by simple reasoning, and by looking at his curves.

First, simple reasoning: When the magnets are present, the inductance of
the coil is lower.  So, by definition of inductance, when the voltage is
turned on, the current is going to rise and fall *faster* with the
magnets present than with them absent.  That means total power going in
during turn-on is going to be higher with the magnets present than with
them absent, and total power going in during turn-off is going to be
lower with the magnets present than with them absent.  Consequently,
power consumed is going to be larger if the magnets are brought to the
coil, the power is turned on, the magnets are removed, and power is
turned off, than it would be if the magnets were either left far away
throughout the cycle, or were left adjacent to the coil throughout the
cycle.

Second, look at the curves:  The power curve, shown most of the way down
the web page, is clearest on this point.  The RED curve, magnets
present, goes up faster and comes down faster.  If you bring up the
magnets, turn on the power, take the magnets away, and then turn off the
power, you get the RED curve going up and the BLUE curve coming down,
and the result is that you're on the "higher consumption" curve going up
*and* coming down.  So, again, power consumed is higher if the motor is
running than if it's shut off.

So, JLN has mis-stated things:  Power consumed is not independent of the
placement of the magnets.  Without careful measurements we can't know
how big the difference is, but there clearly is a difference.

As with all magnetic shields, the only place where you can see any power
being consumed is as the shield is switched on and off.  Look at the
rise and fall -- don't look at the flat peak, it's just a red herring.

Now, the other issue is warming of the core.  As I understand it, when
the core is saturating, things are not behaving "elastically" and some
energy is being lost to heat.  I *think* that amount is different
depending on whether the core starts out saturated (by the external
magnets) or doesn't.  That heat must be measured to get a full energy
balance of the motor, and of course JLN hasn't done that in this series
of experiments.

But once again, I'd like to say I think this is a great page; by putting
everything down, in detail, with measurements and specifications, JLN
has made it possible to fully analyze exactly what is going on, and
determine once and for all where the energy is going and where it is
coming from.  Excellent!



On 02/09/2010 02:16 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
> Understanding the Orbo principle by JL Naudin
> 
> http://jnaudin.free.fr/steorn/html/orboeffecten.htm
> 
> 
> Harry
> 
> 
> 
>       __________________________________________________________________
> Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr! 
> 
> http://www.flickr.com/gift/
> 

Reply via email to