As I stated on the Steorn forum I looked at Naudin's most recent video and see an OU gravitational-electrogmagnetic piston, assuming the energy needed to release the suspended magnets is or can be made -- with the right choice of materials --less than the gravitational potential energy of the suspended magnets.
Harry ----- Original Message ---- > From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Tue, February 9, 2010 8:25:51 PM > Subject: Re: [Vo]:latest from Naudin on the Orbo > > At 04:40 PM 2/9/2010, you wrote: > > Lovely page! Thanks, Harry! > > > > JLN has done a really clear job of describing the effect, well enough > > that it can be reproduced and fully analyzed, with, as far as I can see, > > no hidden tricks. > > Well, to a degree. The explanation is clear, I agree, and this is what the > "Orbo > effect" is on the face, it's what I came up with from slogging through the > Steorn videos.... > > There are two states: toriod de-energized. The permanent magnets are > attracted > by the ferrite core of the toroid, and that attraction does work accelerating > the coil. > > Energized, the coil causes the ferrite core to be non-attractive to the > permanent magnets, so they can, having accelerated toward the core, sail on > past > the core if the timing is right. > > So the big question is how much energy it takes to turn on and shut down the > toroid and thus the attractiveness of the core. If it can be done with lower > energy than the rotor picks up from the "free energy" of attraction, then, > indeed, it seems we'd have energy gain. > > But measuring that turn-on and shutdown energy isn't particularly simple. > Those > are high-speed transients, and determining the energy in them simply by > watching > them on a scope display isn't going to cut it. > > Remember, Sean has insisted that he needs the rapid response of the kind of > battery he is using, an ability to source large currents. Why? Obviously, > large > peak currents are needed! > > I can't say I was disappointed by the promised February 1 demo, because I > didn't > expect better. The demo did not convince one of his own "replicators," and, > reading Sean carefully, that's quite deliberate. He does not want to explain > what is going on, he wants to *sell* that information. He was pretty explicit > that he wasn't going to give it away for free! > > So what he is basically saying is "Trust me! Do I look like I'd lie to you?" > > Yes, unfortunately, quite like that. > > Is he lying? Well, I think he's slipped a few times and has lied. Mostly it > is > obfuscation, deliberately unclear and inconclusive. > > Is he committing fraud? Probably not. > > Is he sincere? Probably not. Not by now. __________________________________________________________________ Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr! http://www.flickr.com/gift/
