At 09:30 PM 3/30/2010, Harry Veeder wrote:
I don't see anything wrong with the way Krivit presented the data in order to make his point.
As I just mentioned in another post, I haven't studied "his point" in this case. Perhaps you'd take a look and explain it. I'm tired of being the only one who deconstructs his rants in detail.
Would you be willing to check it out, cite and look at the original sources, etc.?
