On Apr 3, 2010, at 11:39 AM, Mike Carrell wrote:
[snip]
Here is Mills with set of reactions with H as a fuel which
repeatedly prioduce 50kW energy bursts in an independant lab, with
posted plans for building power plants. Outside labs have verified
experiments producing the hydrino state as measured by NMR
instruments. And, there is a theory claiming consistency with
classical physics valid over 85 orders of magnitude.
[snip]
Glad to hear the hydrino state was measured by NMR. I suggested this
approach here on vortex in 1997.
On Nov 29, 1997, at 6:01 PM, Horace Heffner wrote
(in Molecular hydrino catalysis thread):
At 2:11 PM 11/29/97, Taylor J. Smith wrote:
[snip]
Is it possible that absorption (fusion) and emission of
radiation is a useful mechanism for guiding data collection?]
Yes. Hydrino absorbtion lines might develop in a strong magnetic
field
that would reveal the hydrinos. The though is the hydrino electon
orbital
would unravel due to wave cancellation from the distortion casue by
the
magnetic field. I'm talking ordinary photon absorbtion, not fusion.
If there are a sufficient density of hydrinos in a sample, it also
seems
blatantly obvious that they would show up under NMR analysis. The
close
tight electrons should affect the resonance of the hydrogen nucleus.
On Dec 27, 1997, at 11:53 PM, Horace Heffner wrote
(in Speculations on Orbital Stressing Mechanisms thread):
Assuming hydrinos (Hy) are real, and that they require or can use
adjacent
multiple atom orbitals to dump 27.21 eV energy upon the formation
of the
hy, i.e. multibody collisions, it is then logical to consider not only
multiple simultaneous atomic interactions, but also molecular
interactions.
The reason for this is that the molecules, by being already
joined, bring
their constituant atoms to the collision 100 percent of the time.
There is
a very wide variety of possibilities for such reactions. It is
preferable,
but not necessary, to look for molecule or atom pairs which, upon
contact,
do not tend to cause a chemical reaction.
A logical first place to look at is the H2 atom. Its ionization
energy is
15.42589 eV. If we want to dump 27.21 eV into an ionizing
reaction, we
should therefore look for atoms or molecules that absorb 11.784
eV. BrF
fills that bill nicely with an ionization potential of 11.77 +-
0.01 eV.
However, we could expect a chemical reaction between H2 and BrF.
It is
also noteworthy that Br has an ionization potential of 11.81 eV, or
only
about 0.03 eV off the mark, which is still superior to the K + K++ + H
reaction which is 0.07 eV off the mark.
Further, we should consider HBr, which has an ionization potential
11.66 +-
0.03 eV, which could also put it in the running as a catalyst,
comparing
favorably with the K reaction at 0.11 +- 0.03 eV off the mark. It
may be
possible a mixture of H2 and HBr would work, or D2 and HBr or DBr.
Some suggested reactions are:
H2 + BrF --> Hy + H+ + 2e- + Br+ F + 0.02 eV
H2 + Br --> Hy + H+ + 2e- + Br+ + 0.03 eV
H2 + HBr --> Hy + 2H+ + 2e- + Br -0.125 eV
which are all clearly followed by reactions that reclaim the 27 eV per
reaction. The HBr reaction is short 0.125 eV, which is the
equivalent of a
1450 K collision. It seems reasonable to attempt to provide an
environment
with a mixture of the above species.
One large problem in checking out the efficiency of reactions, and the
theory in general, is detecting the Hydrino. It still seems the
hydrino
should be detectable by NMR spectroscopy, due the strong dipole
moment of
the tight Hy orbital, which should provide a Hy resonance peak with a
higher frequency than the H or H2O proton peaks. The Hy NMR peak
might be
highly subdued in amplitude due to the sheilding provided by the tight
electron orbital in the hydrino.
Regards,
Horace Heffner
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
