Here is a nice presentation on an advanced fission reactor concept that is
1)      Accelerator driven (for makeup neutrons)
2)      Subcritical
3)      Uses natural uranium (un-enriched) as a molten salt
4)      Can remediate its own waste

http://www.ornl.gov/sci/nuclear_science_technology/nstip/presentation/Pierso
n_seminar.pdf

Biggest problem is the cost - especially the cost of accelerator beam line -
which adds at least one billion $ to the overhead. 

Query: is there a place for LENR here ?

How can that be? you ask . after all, LENR provides few neutrons . 

. well here is one way. Use LENR techniques only to make the "clusters" -
then turn everything back over to the mainstream. That would be assuming the
reality of "deuterium clusters", of course, and the known fact that the
Arata powder is ferromagnetic. Combine it all with known science, and a new
kind of low cost beam line can be imagined.

This would be one where "loaded" nanoparticles are suspended in a permanent
magnet field, and then accelerated by a travelling magnetic wave. Target can
be depleted uranium. The threshold for neutrons here is only a few MeV
compared to the GeV needed for efficient proton spallation.

This "powder pusher" kind of accelerator is not all that different from the
concept of the Bae Institute (Dr. Young K. Bae) and Winterberg for
"micro-fusion".  That concept was envisioned to employ acceleration of
nanoparticles by an undisclosed hypervelocity method (v > 100 km/s) for
fusion. How they push "powder" to that velocity is not clear but apparently
it has been done by a magnetic traveling wave or some kind ... It is
actually low velocity compared to gigavolt proton beams, which are near
lightspeed.

The tradeoff is much higher density "particles" being accelerated to a lower
velocity,  but the net energy deposited in the target can be similar - and
the cost of neutrons should be far less. That remains to be demonstrated.

This powder-pusher beam actually makes more sense for fission than fusion,
since all you need for makeup neutrons is a few grams per year. Even a
subcritical reactor has a high neutron multiplication factor, but the safety
feature is the big selling point. 

Turn off the accelerator and the reactions quickly stops. That feature is
priceless. What nextgen fission needs first is a 90% reduction in the makeup
neutron source.

Jones






Reply via email to