Scott,
HSG thread agrees with your hunch 
http://forum.hydrino.org/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=259&sid=70e984ef95d881762c23a4436223a47c
Re: What Is BLP's CIHT Miracle?

[cid:[email protected]]<http://forum.hydrino.org/viewtopic.php?p=7650&sid=70e984ef95d881762c23a4436223a47c#p7650>by
 Wesley Bruce on May 17th, 2010, 3:23 am
My hunch is that its a hydrodynamics based system with integral cooling. 
Magetohydrodynamics occurs when a dynamic charged fluid moves through a field. 
Currents flow and can be tapped to a load. There are power-plants based on this 
technology already, some are large, some are small and some a tiny. There are 
pumps and even propulsion systems. 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetohydrodynamics
There is a variant called an electrohydrodynamic power-plant where the magnetic 
fields are replaced with electrostatic charges and self induced field effects 
in certain materials. The blacklight reaction occurs in a hot plasma and heats 
that plasma. With the right geometry you can pinch that plasma biasing it like 
a jet or rocket to flow in a given direction. If you only take out the 
additional energy added by the hydrinos creation you have a sustainable flow 
you can loop back to the start. You take the energy out by passing the hot fast 
flow past a set of coils. Essentially this is a transformer with one set of 
current elements being wires and the other being a plasma flow. This would make 
CIHT Chemical Ion Hydrodynamic Turbine or Transformer. Ion could be ionic. The 
active hydrino phase would be one one side of the loop and the cooler 
regenerator on the other side of the loop. This would be almost solid state 
with only the injection of new hydrogen and the removal of hydri!
 nos.
It would need to be cooled a little but its a direct plasma motion to electric 
current motion conversion not a heat engine. This it would have thermodynamic 
limits but not Carnot efficiency limits. All cooling would be integral to the 
underfloor unit so the radiator is not missing its just subsumed within the 
CIHT volume.
In all likelihood a quantity of units would be packed in parallel with in the 
box. They would run continuously. Stopping starting the loop and charging and 
unchanging is inefficient. This explains the hybrid talk. Vehicles have an 
uneven power demand but a hydrodynamic power-plant has a preference for 
constant steady state flat output operation.
I may be wrong but it fits the claims, the description and the properties of a 
hydrogen hydrino reaction.
Every motor has a corresponding pump and every pump a motor. Ion based 
hydrodynamic pumps are standard in some lab equipment and remember that's Dr 
Randell Mills background.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Wm. Scott Smith

Sat, 20 Mar 2010 09:37:03 -0700

> The new documents have no stated authroship. The style of writing suggest

> that they are lifted from third-party technical reports, somewhat in the

> style of descriptions in a patent disclosure.







I think Published Patent Text is Public Domain--Do any of you really know?  I

have thought seriously about using some description of ZPE and its history from

these sources.







> A third document discusses a tecnology called CIHT which produces

> electricity directly from the BLP reaction without a thermal-electric

> converstion system. The context is BLP for automobiles,with a projected

> performance of 1500 miles on a litr to water, or 2500 miles on a 20 liter,

> 100 atm hydrogen tank. Distressingly, only the barest hints at the CHIT

> technology are given.





This sounds like Electromagnetic Hydrodyamic Drive.  An electrically-conducting

ionized gas is propelled through a strong magnetic field inducing a current

that across the flow and across the magnetic field lines.  I have often

wondered if this approach should have been used in the exhaust pipe to replace

the alternator in a car!  It would also make the engine work harder, but might

be more efficient.







Scott


<<inline: image001.gif>>

Reply via email to