At 07:24 PM 6/10/2010, Jones Beene wrote:
The Oppenheimer–Phillips process, or deuteron stripping reaction, is a type of deuteron-induced nuclear reaction which depends on charge shielding. In this process, the neutron component of an energetic deuteron fuses with a target nucleus, transmuting the target to a heavier isotope while ejecting a proton. An example is the nuclear transmutation of carbon-12 to carbon-13.

From the Wikipedia article (today's revision: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Oppenheimer%E2%80%93Phillips_process&action=historysubmit&diff=338693666&oldid=338639507)

The Oppenheimer–Phillips process or strip reaction is a type of <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deuteron>deuteron-induced <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_reaction>nuclear reaction. In this process the <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron>neutron half of an energetic deuteron (a stable <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope>isotope of <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen>hydrogen with one <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton>proton and one neutron) fuses with a target <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_nucleus>nucleus, transmuting the target to a heavier isotope while ejecting a proton. An example is the <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_transmutation>nuclear transmutation of <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon-12>carbon-12 to <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon-13>carbon-13.

I wrote much of this, though the skeleton came from some different source. Ya really should credit sources, Jones.

Let us make the clear distinction that this is a fusion reaction, followed by beta day of the heavier nucleus. The fusion is between deuterium and nickel. The ash is a proton, and eventually a beta particle and a transmuted element (to copper). The mechanics of interaction allow a nuclear fusion interaction to take place at much lower energies than would be expected from a calculation of the Coulomb barrier between a deuteron and a target nucleus.

This part is yours. The "much lower energies" are still high energy. The "calculation of the Coulomb barrier" refers to considering the deuteron as a single charge at a single point. In fact, deuterons are the most asymmetrical of nucleons, the charge is not distributed uniformly.

From the article:
The process allows a nuclear interaction to take place at lower energies than would be expected from a simple calculation of the <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coulomb_barrier>Coulomb barrier between a deuteron and a target nucleus.

This is because as the deuteron approaches the positively charged target nucleus, it experiences a <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dipole>charge polarization where the "proton-end" faces away from the target and the "neutron-end" faces towards the target. The fusion proceeds when the binding energy of the neutron and the target nucleus exceeds the binding energy of the deuteron and a proton is then <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrostatic_repulsion>repelled from the new heavier nucleus.<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oppenheimer%E2%80%93Phillips_process#cite_note-friend68-0>[1]

This is because as the deuteron approaches the positively charged target nucleus, it experiences a charge polarization where the "proton-end" faces away from the target and the "neutron-end" faces towards the target.

It is possible that similar charge polarization is involved in cold fusion. The stripping reaction would produce +1 neutron nuclei, and energetic protons, with the velocity of the protons being higher than that of the incident deuterons. One can think of the nucleus and its action on the deuteron here as being a catapult. The catapult is loaded by the heavier deuteron coming in and losing its kinetic energy to charge-repulsion potential energy, then the neutron is yanked from the deuteron, and all that potential energy now accelerates the lighter proton away from the nucleus.

But it's a long shot. I even edited this article after being banned from "cold fusion," though it was just a minor edit affecting links, nothing controversial, and in spite of the fact that the cabal tried to ding me for it, the edit stood and nothing came of the charges. I really hadn't thought of it as a violation, and this just shows how far the "skeptics" on Wikipedia will go to exclude people.

The deuteron must be accelerated of course, but the rate of acceleration, being a function of time, is expected to be influenced by time distortion within a Casimir cavity. In this hypothesis, the Casimir cavity of 2-10 nm is a sine qua non. The fusion proceeds when the binding energy of the approaching neutron and the target nucleus exceeds the binding energy of the deuteron and the trailing proton. That proton is then repelled from the new heavier nucleus. This is one indicia of the reaction – hydrogen in place of deuterium – which will poison the reaction unless removed.

OK – putting that into the context of nickel, with the 58Ni, the O-P effect would give 59Ni as the activated nucleus – but this has a very long half-lie – thousands of years so that does not help us very much. However, with 64Ni you get 65Ni as the activated nucleus and it has a 2.5 hr half life and decays to copper. This is the range half-life that can explain “heat after death” and also the delay in heat buildup over time.

Except you've got to figure out how the deuteron can get the necessary energy. I don't think single deuterons can do it. But maybe you can come up with a way... Copper is not the primary reaction product, helium is.

Reply via email to