Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
> 1) The energy amplification is on the order of several hundred times. > 2) No radiation was detected. > 3) Ordinary Hydrogen was used with Nickel powder (see patent application > > http://v3.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/description?CC=WO&NR=2009125444A1&KC=A1&FT=D&date=20091015&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP > ). > > All three of these things point to Hydrino formation being the primary > source of > the energy, not nuclear reactions. > I do not have any strong opinion about whether hydrinos and the Mills effect exist or not, but I must say if this can be verified, it does seem like pretty good evidence for that hypothesis. Perhaps support Mills more than conventional cold fusion, since nearly every study I know reports no excess heat with light water. The only exception is Patterson. Those beads were coated with Pd or Ni with a Cu substrate. See, for example: http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MileyGHoverviewofa.pdf I could not remember -- and I still don't recall exactly -- whether than they had any with both Pd and Ni on the same bead. There is a handy website to look this stuff up, LENR-CANR.org it's called, but I did not do a careful search. Speaking of handy web sites, here is one that claims that Charles Beaudette died in 2006. He didn't; he was still last fall when I last heard from him: http://www.worldsci.org/php/index.php?tab0=Scientists&tab1=Scientists&tab2=Display&id=821 There is section here on me with a photo for goodness sake. It does not claim I am dead. - Jed
