i copied and pasted a piece from the article i linked.  thought it
would be interesting.

On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 6:38 AM, Roarty, Francis X
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Alexander,
>        You only mention gravity but overlooked time. we are all accelerating 
> equivalently at 9.8m/s^2 in earth's gravity well and time runs slower than an 
> observer outside a gravity well...not as slow as approaching an event horizon 
> but still measurably slower as proved by the need to correct GPS satellites. 
> Time also slows equivalently for objects with spatial velocity approaching 
> luminal values. IMHO the ability of mass to slow time is multiplied by 
> wavelength suppression when conductive cavity walls take on Casimir geometry. 
> The suppression of longer wavelengths inside the cavity walls forms a 
> reservoir of higher energy density outside the cavity walls equivalent to a 
> much larger mass but unlike the slow gradient of a gravity well this method 
> is abrupt which creates
> The opportunity for a unique phenomena not available at the macro level. The 
> abrupt change bordered by the cavity walls allows any small holes or defects 
> to create a venturi where the reservoir maintains a constant stream that is 
> faster than the isotropic value outside the cavity - effectively utilizing 
> the typical slowing effect of mass on time to accelerate it in a very small 
> confined space between the walls of a Casimir cavity. This interpretation 
> would mean longer wavelengths are not displaced from the space inside the 
> cavity but instead look like higher frequency wavelengths because they are 
> being accelerated in time. No need for near luminal velocity on the spatial 
> axis because we are instead directly manipulating the time axis.
> Regards
> Fran
> http://froarty.scienceblog.com/16/relativistic-interpretation-of-casimir-effect/
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Alexander 
> Hollins
> Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 3:57 PM
> To: vortex-l
> Subject: [Vo]:Equivalence breaks down.
>
> http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/25331/
> The equivalence principle is one of the more fascinating ideas in
> modern science. It asserts that gravitational mass and inertial mass
> are identical. Einstein put it like this: the gravitational force we
> experience on Earth is identical to the force we would experience were
> we sitting in a spaceship accelerating at 1g. Newton might have said
> that the m in F=ma is the same as the ms in F=Gm1m2/r^2.
>
>

Reply via email to