On 06/19/2010 01:40 AM, [email protected] wrote: > First off, the fine structure constant isn't :-) meaning it is not really > constant, and supposedly has a value that "must be" determined > experimentally but never has - yet, there are many tantalizing natural > quantum relationship that get you close to 1/137 - to the extent that > anyone > with a mystical inclination can come to understand Eddington's fascination > with a logical derivation. > > ......................................................... > > Finally you (this group ) is asking the right questions. The > questions of about the hydrino > and the aeather go no where. > Where does the find structure constant come from? I have found an > answer. It is the ratio of the > speed of sound in the nucleus to the speed of light in a vacuum.
Based on my calculations, the ratio between two times your "speed of sound in the nucleus" and the speed of light. Can you elaborate further? Speed of sound in the nucleus... let's call it that way if you like. In my opinion you are confusing (or masking?) a fundamental property with a derived, or better said, secondary effect. Can I ask you a question? You say that the speed is 1.094 Mhz meters. What's your estimated frequency(or frequency range) for this "sound"? > Look for my next paper in Infinite Energy > in July. I do this calculation. I presented the answer at Johns > Hopkins in Feb. > > http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/chaptere.html I hate to ask this but, can we see a preprint? > > ..................................................................................... > > The review of Planck's constant is long overdue. It is empirical. It > cannot be derived from fundamental analysis. > I have presented my constant 1.094 million meters per second. It is > not empirical, it is the velocity of sound in > the nucleus. I have derived the energy levels of the hydrogen atom, > and the probability of transition based on this constant > in last oct IE. > > http://www.scribd.com/doc/25456609/Frank-Znidarsic-Control-of-Natural-Forces-leading-to-Cold-Fusion-and-Anti-Gravity > > > In the next addition I will derive the energy of the photon. > > These ideas are large. I should get a Noble prize, however, they will > be largely unnoticed. Not unnoticed, but ignored, Frank. Regards, Mauro > > > > Frank Znidarsic
