Stability or Instability of Muonium and Positronium
 
http://forum.hydrino.org/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=301&sid=1f2fba03c407c49bbd531378519406df

[cid:[email protected]]<http://forum.hydrino.org/viewtopic.php?p=8411&sid=660ed72a86876a30036ed381166d4ef7#p8411>froarty
 said on June 30th, 2010, 8:11 am
JohnEB wrote: what does bother me though is, that when you calculate the effect 
that you get when you put a helium atom inside a small box, the energy levels 
go up, not down. or at least rather the ground state goes up if you just do a 
standard non-relativistic schrodinger type calculation. what i have not yet 
seen however is a calculation been made on a helium atom in a cavity with the 
casimir effects included for comparison. do you have a link to one such?

I have the same difficulty with spontaneous emission being delayed in a 
waveguide or the opposing claims of both anomalous heating and cooling and 
claims of increase and decrease of nuclear half lives of atomic gases in 
catalysts. I updated my blog
http://froarty.scienceblog.com/32155/relativistic-interpertation-of-casimir-effect-expanded/.
 to include some of these opposing reports. I am proposing that time dilation 
in lattice powered Casimir geometry or an RF powered waveguide is really a 
matter of segregation. The concentrated accelerated dilation in the cavity has 
a weaker more diffused retarding counterpart outside the cavity. Suppression 
remains the power source but it creates both a resivoir and a rushing stream 
where the effect on the atomic gas depends on geometry to steer the gas atoms 
into favoring one area over another.

I have no problem removing the Bourgoin citation or even the non-physical 
argument between Professor Naudts and
Professor Dombrey. I don't think anyone has yet properly framed the problem. 
IMHO this isn't the physical acceleration of indvidual atoms but rather an 
abrupt negative form of equivalent acceleration. The Casimir geometry allows a 
HUGE number of atoms in the lattice of the plates (cavity walls) to accumulate 
their gravity wells in an accelerated manner due to the insulating effect of 
suppression on their interior walls. This change in equivalent acceleration on 
the exterior walls of Casimir plate should also cause time dilation but to a 
much lesser effect and in the normal direction we recognize from astrophysics 
to slow time at the bottom of a gravity well. The tiny cavity between the 
plates however focuses this reservoir into a venturi accelerating time much 
faster than the ambient speed filling the sails/ plates (if the hole is small 
enough geometry it will never deplete the sails). Everyone wants to convert 
this into orbital acceleration from our perspective and then work their math 
magic from there but that may be an issue. If I am correct about this being a 
form of equivalent acceleraion then the plates are the energy souce and we 
should be seeking a relationship between the Casimir formula and the energy 
formula for hydrogen. I won't suggest
a relationship with the standard Pythagorean Gamma formula but some 
relationship to gamma based on equivalent acceleration must exist?

My posit is that this change in equivalent acceleration between the interior 
and exterior of the cavity is abrupt not spread over parsecs of space as slight 
changes in gradients that you have with a normal gravity well. Casimir effect 
appears to provide both the shielding and the pressure relief channels to 
exploit this diferential using atomic gas. If the hydrino can be modeled 
relativisticlly in the suns corona then equivalent acceleraton inside a Casimir 
cavity should also be possible.

Sorry this wasn't the math reply you anticipated but I know my limitations,
Fran


<<inline: image001.gif>>

Reply via email to