Jones Beene said on Mon, 05 Jul 2010 06:42:
An alternative view is that the internal
Casimir cavities hold the bulk of deuterium in a denser form. Some experts
like Ed Storms believe that the method, or the conclusion for determining
the high loading ratio is flawed.
Jones,
I have been wondering about these loading ratios, If I
understand correctly saturation is 1:1 in a lattice and 4:1 on a surface? I
expect Casimir cavities have a much higher loading ratio based on fractional
states 1/(2-137) allowing a greater concentration than geometry would
normally allow for the size of the cavity, and then there is also the
question of fractional h2 flowing back out of the cavity into the lattice
where they MIGHT remain fractionally contained by a saturated lattice - a
dihydrino moving in lockstep with hydrogen or deuterium atoms in the
lattice. I don't believe the hydrino can exist outside of a catalyst
environment but once condensed inside a cavity the saturated lattice still
represents a catalytic environment where a fractional h2 or d2 could now
squeeze easily inside a single cell. These fractional diatoms would have a
pressure/ desire to become monatomic that might also play a part at the
surface interface as their population in the lattice grows. How would such a
"pressure" effect lockstep motion or the surface interface? I think the
Lawandry paper on surface charges relates to Casimir cavities where the
effect is multiplied many fold by bringing an opposing plate into the
equation - my hope is that his math may allow a new way to model suppression
and Casimir effect.
Regards
Fran
