In reply to Jones Beene's message of Fri, 8 Oct 2010 18:24:29 -0700: Hi, [snip] >-----Original Message----- >From: [email protected] > >> He talks about Hydrogen isotopes embedded in heavier atoms, then goes on >to suggest a new form of gravity to explain this. > >> A more likely explanation is a Hydrinohydride ion displacing one of the >inner electrons of the heavy atom ... > >Wow, Robin - you are really behind on your email ...
I still have stuff going back years, but I responded to this by accident. I didn't realize how old it was when I responded. >but my reflexive >response, also from memory is that the two explanations are not mutually >incompatible. > >It does not have to be a "new form of gravity" at least not in some of the >attempts at "unification" (of all the forces) where gravity is more than a >long-range force, in that it flip-flops and increases exponentially at close >range. > >... not that I can explain it any better than that... > > ..This brings to mind Charles Cagle's explanation of the electric force reversing when the De Broglie wavelengths of two particles in the CM frame overlap. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html
