At 12:39 PM 10/28/2010, Jones Beene wrote:
From: Frank

Ø I think Schwinger was correct in attributing sonoluminescence to Casimir effect but should have concentrated on the rate of change in Casimir geometry by the meniscus of the compressed bubbles in cavitation- the liquid medium is uniform and if conductive makes the bubble essentially equivalent to Casimir plates

You and I agree that Schwinger was correct on this – and that excess energy could have come from that source, but still - this overlooks the claimed “radiation poisoning” and the anomalous large excesses. How would Stringham have missed it, for instance?

They may have set up conditions that were well beyond what had ever been done before. That's likely, by the way, I think.

It would be instructive to see a medical report which affirms that radiation poisoning was diagnosed by a professional – instead of this being 100% anecdotal.

Well, I'll repeat what he wrote:

I was sickened, along with Serge, in two separate experiments. We barely survived the first set of experiments, this is no laughing matter. The day after the experiment, Serge showed symptoms first, vomiting and diarrhea. A day later, I was in the same boat. For two days, we both had to fight to breath, I was convinced I was going to die. My wife and children witnessed both of our symptoms, Serge stayed with us for months before he was well enough to return home to Cleveland. I lost about one third of my hair. I had beta burn on my skin. I was sore down the entire length of the right side of my body, the side facing the experiment. Blood tests showed that my white blood cells were nearly wiped out. McMaster University did SKY radiation dosimetry on us gratis, and found multiple chromosome breaks and translocations in both of us and concluded it was plausible it was caused by radiation damage. For five months, we had no ability to thermoregulate our body temperature, which would swing from 95 degrees up to 101 degrees, back and forth over the course of minutes. I had to cal 911 when Serge passed out from a 95 degree body temperature. The first responders did not even dare to enter the lab to carry him out. Over the course of months, we both lost the linings of our intestines. This was particularly disturbing since GI problems associated with radiation are the sign of a near fatal dose. Every object within two meters of the experiment was laced with nuclear tracks.

The experiment triggered massive transmutation of the elements, conformed by extensive SEM-EDAX, XPS and LA-ICP-MS mass spec. Ninety different elements were detected in large amounts (grams), inluding the presence of many short-lived isotopes. The isotope ratios were indentical to those found in supernovas, and did not resemble natural abundances at all. The transmuted particles were so hot, they cooked the polystyrene dishes they were placed in, turning the bottom nearly opaque with nuclear tracks that formed a ring around the bottom of the dish.

This is only a small sample of what happened. A warning to you all, anyone spending more than a few hours next to this device would end up dead.

There are suspicious aspects to this. Why did the first responders not "dare to enter the lab?" The way the story is told, they did not at first suspect radiation sickness. That's why it happened twice. But, with the first responders, clearly it was believed that there was significant radiation. They talk about a Geiger counter only showing 20% count elevation. That would not inhibit a first responder, they'd go into worse than that!

But it can happen that doubts can be raised about real and factual resports. I could go on about reasons for skepticism. But, on the other side, if he is reporting (perhaps not perfectly!) about what happened, this was radiation sickness.

So far, all positive reports about this have come from Mark. I originally said that he was either lying or he'd made a major discovery. I'll add a third possibility: he's insane. I think of Nash.

I doubt that LeClair is competent to make that kind of diagnosis otherwise.

Following the story, he did not do it on his own. I've seen nothing from his partner on this, "Serge." Serge is the one with a prior expressed interest in zero point energy, fusion, and the Casimir effect. David Nagel has known about this work, and was quoted in the examiner.com article as having had his bullshit detector activated when he heard about the radiation poisoning. What does that mean? Given that he said nothing positive, and that he's apparently known Mark LeClair for years, according to what I quoted here, this is telling.

What I'd recommend, for someone with the resources and the need to know, is to first attempt to validate the account. Those first responders, they would remember the incident. How many times do you refuse to go into a lab because the radiation levels are too high? This is a rural area, I believe. It would be fairly easy for someone investigating to find out about the incident. They have sent samples of the allegedly neutron-activated material, a superficial examination found nothing unusual, but the analyses may not have been deep enough. What Mark published was inadequate to tell what was going on. (An analysis with no description of what was being analyzed, i.e., the samples, and no controls, isn't terribly impressive, and, remember, we must keep in mind the possibility of a sophisticated fabrication.)

The actual dosimetry lab results mentioned could be seen, and the lab contacted. With permission from LeClair and his partner, of course.

If enough evidence can be found to believe that the radiation event really happened, then some serious effort should be put into replication. First, can NanoSpire replicate this, preferably on a smaller scale! Given the technology they were using and all the detailed results supposedly developed, they should be able to replicate, readily.

LeClair has sufficient established reputation in his field, it seems, to give this a first assumption of credibility. But the Nash affair shows that a respected scientist can also be a paranoid schizophrenic, capable of conflating a set of events into a totally fantastic story. The lack of input and report from Serge leads me to suspect this, as a possibility.

However, there were at one time on the web many other reports about ill health effects which were seen in circumstances where energy anomalies and EUV could have been present, and if memory serves, Bill B. included a couple on his site years ago, but they may have been removed … since they were said to have been due to “orgone” or negative orgone, whatever that is.

Great. Just what we need.

This was not a marginal "ill health effect." From the symptoms described, they almost died, and they could still die from cancer.

One of the suspicious aspects of the story is that they do not seem to have been hospitalized. But perhaps the story was incomplete.

IOW do you find any merit in justifying one pseudo-scientific claim with others?

Answer: you might if you are a hands-on experimenter.

Yes, but it is a Bad Idea. Stick with the facts.

This level of doubt does not negate LeClair’s other claims, but there are many other red flags besides radiation poisoning. Several in fact.

Jones

Yes. Lots, in fact. Let me propose, though, a positive possibility. They got severe radiation poisoning, because they got a major level of hot fusion reaction. Remember the "dead graduate student effect"? They experienced it. Perhaps had they been grad students, forced to work themselves to the bone, or whatever the grad student unions allege about working conditions, they'd be dead....

They might not be, after that, particularly sane for a while.

It should be possible to independently verify enough of this story to move on to investigating what actually happened and how to replicate it.

Mark claims, though, that he wasn't expecting nuclear reactions, he talks about expecting velocities of 20,000 mph, and that the real velocity was 0.5 c, which is where he needs to explain how these crystals would accelerate to such a speed. That he'd have had the facilities and expertise to measure those velocities, in the availalbe time, is, again, suspicious. The story is a bit contradictory on this.

I still would not be surprised to get a mail from the real Mark LeClair, saying that he'd been away for a week .... on the other hand, I do know that Mark, or someone claiming to be Mark, did communicate about the nuclear incident about a year ago. Serge has been cc'd on some mails, but has not shown up.

More will be revealed, I presume.

Reply via email to