Thank you for pointing out that gravity is not energy. I get caught up thinking about waves as energy, and get sloppy. I am not a scientist.
But the idea intrigues me that there is a speed in the nucleus at which waves might travel. And if there is no energy involved, or no energy lost when considering a photon, then I don't understand how resistance has any meaning. If gravity travels at the same speed as light in a vacuum, then perhaps it travels at the same speed as light in matter. If Frank is correct, then one prediction is that the speed of gravity in a superconductor will be found to be 1094xxx meters / second, from the previous reference. Craig On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 10:23 -0800, Jones Beene wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: Craig Haynie > > > Conceptually, gravity traveling in a superconductor is essentially the > same thing as light traveling in the nucleus: it's just energy traveling > without resistance through matter. > > This does not follow, Craig. And this whole line of bogosity about defining > quantum transitions as a speed is getting almost to the point of lunacy. > > 1) What makes you think a nucleus offers no resistance? > 2) What makes you think that gravity is energy? Gravity is a force, and a > force is NOT energy. A force can have potential energy and be converted into > energy, but is not energy. > > > If Frank is right, then these gravity waves are traveling at 1094000 m/s. > > This has little to do with anyone's quantum theory. This is the approximate > escape velocity of our sun. > > Jones > > > > >
