Mitchell Swartz <[email protected]> wrote:
[several examples of Rothwell being inconsistent
and untruthful .... all deleted for bandwidth]
- At 10:25 AM 11/19/98 -0500, Jed Rothwell wrote:
- >Swartz: "If yes, was it a vertical flow calorimetric system?"
- >
- >Rothwell: "Me: "Yes."
- Corroborating this, only a desperate sophomore
- would honestly think they could claim to have sampled
- the cell, applied the FLOW EQUATION (which itself
- is an approximation) and have it as a "non-flow configuration".
- In this case, Rothwell knew it was a flow system.
- ===========================================
- 2A. The Pressure Head Fell
- When Rothwell "diverted the flow into a cup"
- two more errors appeared. First, the pressure head
- was decreased, as Mitchell Jones correctly previously pointed
- out . . .
Rothwell: "The flow rate would have to change by a factor of 50 to 100 (at different times during the run). We could see and hear the water falling back into the reservoir. The flow did not change by a factor of 50. We would have noticed that. When say "we" I mean myself and the others who watched me do the tests, including Patterson, Cravens, George Miley and others. These other people agreed that the method works, and that it confirmed Cravens' flow calorimetry. Swartz is not only calling me incompetent, he is saying that George Miley et al. are incompetent."
Rothwell is quite mistaken again.
Profs. Miley and Cravens do exceptional good work.
The late Dr. Patterson did exceptionally good work.
Based upon the rants posted, no one but Rothwell
is incompetent. The Evidence speaks for itself.
==================================================
Rothwell: "I am sorry to keep harping on this, but it is a prime example of the way some cold fusion researchers attack research by others in this field, for irrational reasons. Swartz, Arata and others are often as bad as the worst skeptics. I expect that many cold fusion researchers will soon be attacking Rossi for similar irrational reasons. Swartz may attack Rossi for the same reason he attacks Patterson & Cravens: because Rossi also uses vertical flow calorimetry during the the liquid phase. For that matter, so do the people at SRI, Energetics Technologies and elsewhere. I have not noted that Swartz attacks McKubre, but I wouldn't put it past him. In any case, I am in good company with the likes of Miley and McKubre. I am confident that they are right, and Swartz is wrong.
I shall say no more about this."
Jed Rothwell was exposed in this thread falsely purporting that Dr. Arata and myself
posted to Wikipedia about him. That never happened. Just like before
Rothwell confabulated and posted paranoid nonsense.
For the record:
The ONLY one attacking cold fusion pioneers has been
Jed Rothwell, often behind their backs, from the beginning
in 1989 to the present.
Mitchell Swartz
- Jed
