Swartz, its pretty clear whose 'ranting' here... Shoo... you're wasting bandwidth.
-Mark _____ From: Mitchell Swartz [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2011 9:15 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Vo]:Input power must be far lower than ~10 kW Rothwell: "I am sorry to keep harping on this, but it is a prime example of" One more issue. Rothwell's ad hominem are not, and have never been, a substitute for his failure to calibrate, his failure to maintain a pressure head, and his failure to use anything close to an adequate sampling rate. In the case at issue, Rothwell reported a sampling rate of only 2 to 4 times per day!!! At 10:25 AM 11/19/98 -0500, Jed Rothwell wrote: > How many times did you remove 250cc from the flow circuit to test the > temperature? >Rothwell: With the large CETI cell, about a dozen times over three days. With >our >cells, twice a day This implies that Rothwell has no credibility on this matter, either. It cannot be stressed enough: Real experimentalists use sampling rates closer to 1 Hertz (sometimes more, sometimes less, but not 2 times per day), and they use many controls -- including joule controls. Mitchell Swartz
