No, I am rather deaf- not completely anyway- I enjoy good music. You can write me at peter.gl...@gmail.com and I will answer immediately, with pleasure. Peter
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 7:41 PM, noone noone <thesteornpa...@yahoo.com>wrote: > Do you have Skype? Could we talk on there? > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Sent:* Thu, January 20, 2011 12:39:13 PM > > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Deuterium kills the reaction? > > They have a complex technology, needs a lot of development, can be > replicated but no easily. Take please a look to the papers at the > BlackLightPower website. They will demonstrate later this year their CIHT > technology- it generates electricity. I have worked 40 years in the chemical > industry nad I have an understanding of the problems they have to solve > before becoming a very important source of energy. My best friend Mike > Carrell who has also worked for long years -electrotechnics, advent of > elctronics also sees Randy's technology as The Solution > Peter > > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 7:27 PM, noone noone <thesteornpa...@yahoo.com>wrote: > >> Then why does BLP not produce a product? >> >> They seem to have had a rock solid easily to replicate technology for a >> decade. >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> >> >> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com >> *Sent:* Thu, January 20, 2011 10:30:34 AM >> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Deuterium kills the reaction? >> >> Dear Jones, >> >> Randy Mills would not agree with your assertion. >> He is waiting for the scientific analysis (that of Bologna professors) to >> make an opinion of the demonstration and the generator. >> >> If hydrinos have played a role, they can be found with the method >> described e..g. in this paper: >> RL Mills et many: "Commercializable Power Source from Forming New States >> of Hydrogen" Int J. Hydrogen Energy vol 34 (2009) 573-614 >> >> One of the greaest advantages of Mills upon "us" is that he understand >> what happens in his systems. He has a first class theory- that predicts. >> Second class theory prohibits, third class describes, explans what has >> happened> What kind of theory do we have? A "good" point is that we have >> many! >> >> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: >> >>> *From:* noone noone >>> >>> >>> >>> Ø I don't think there is any RF generator. >>> >>> >>> >>> The purpose of the Rossi “black box” is said to be a secret, but if it >>> were merely a DC power supply for a resistive heater, then you would be >>> implying a planned intent to deceive the audience, which is not impossible, >>> but unlikely. >>> >>> >>> >>> Ø I do not see any need for an RF generator. I think the system can >>> self sustain if the temperature is hot enough, but the problem is that there >>> could be a runaway explosion if that happens. >>> >>> Again, the need for RF is NOT as a heater, but as a means of spin >>> flipping hydrogen to attain negative temperature in this (highly >>> speculative) hypothesis. Rossi cannot mention RF as an input in the patent, >>> since RF has been previously patented as a way to heat a hydrogen nuclear >>> reactor. >>> >>> >>> >>> And since Rossi is probably unaware of the quasi-BEC modality (assuming >>> that it could be accurate to some extent) then he probably thinks the >>> advantage of RF over other input is the great unknown mystery, and which he >>> admits to not comprehending. >>> >>> >>> >>> If it turns out to indeed be RF input, then we can say that he found out >>> that it is advantageous through trial and error, yet apparently thinks that >>> it works for the same reason that it is used in prior-art, in tokomaks, etc. >>> So he could be right for the wrong reason. >>> >>> >>> >>> Although my underlying hypothesis of operation - with the quasi-BEC - is >>> admittedly “way out there” on the fringe of the fringe, it is pretty clear >>> that Rossi has done what Randell Mills could not do. >>> >>> >>> >>> In effect, you seem to be saying that Rossi has invented nothing more >>> than a better version of the Mills’ reactor. That is most unlikely, since >>> Mills has not gotten his to run in a continuous mode for long enough to >>> begin placement in the grid plants of his licensees, and he is far better >>> funded. >>> >>> >>> >>> Rossi claims a year of operation already. OK maybe that is an >>> exaggeration, but it is clear to me that he has made a major breakthrough >>> advance over Mills, even though he may have borrowed the basic starting >>> ingredients - and so far that alone implies a fundamental difference in the >>> MO. >>> >>> >>> >>> It may not be RF as the input, but it is probably going to be new >>> physics; and the hypothesis of dense hydrogen (pycno) leading to a quasi-BEC >>> has not been shot down yet. Of course, that could happen later today J >>> >>> >>> >>> Jones >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > >
