"no more demos before the start up..." That's elementary "wonder management" - miracles are not repeatable and the next miracle must be much greater (1MeV!) than the former. There are exceptions as San Gennaro's blood- fine application of non-newtonian viscosity. To remain at miracles. I think that the secret ingredient, the catalyst is just a differentiator that says "our generator is NOT the same as Piantelli's" but it is nothing sure. Peter
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 11:24 PM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson < [email protected]> wrote: > From Jed: > > > WARNING TO ALL OUR READERS: THE REPORT OF THE UNIVERSITY OF > > BOLOGNA WILL BE DELIVERED MONDAY , JAN 24, ANYTIME. > > YOU WILL FIND IT ON THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND WE > > ALREADY GIVE TO EVERYBODY TO REPRODUCE IT EVERYWHERE, FOR > > ANY PURPOSE, FREE. > > WARM REGARDS, > > THE BOARD OF ADVISERS OF THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR PHYSICS > > > > Dear Luigi, > > Yes there will be a Scientist talking about us [at ICCF16], no demo > anyway: > > no more demos before the start up of the 1 MW plant. > > Warm Regards, > > > ...and so most of use who reside in the honorable peanut gallery > section will wait with baited breath for January 24 to roll around, > "ANYTIME" soon. I certainly hope UoB's highly anticipated report will > put to rest many concerns. I'm a patient man. I can wait a little > longer. ;-) > > OTOH, I suspect the statement, "no more demos before the start up..." > is likely to frustrate many - perhaps rightly so. It strikes me > primarily as being a strategic corporate maneuver. Expressing an > opinion similar to the lines of Jed's commentary, I too suspect > corporate maneuvering of this nature will eventually turn out to be a > futile attempt to establish complete and total dominance of the CF > field from the ground floor. More glory to the Roman Empire, or not. > > Assuming they eventually do let the cat out of the bag, I suspect good > old fashion corporate espionage and reverse engineering are likely to > end up spreading-the-wealth in no time flat. Seems to me that it will > be inevitable that espionage and reverse engineering will feverishly > occur, ESPECIALLY in many developing countries where the desperate > need for such devices will make a huge impact on living conditions of > the local population. Shoot! Actually, it doesn't have to be illegal > at all. All a smart-ass engineer has to do is tweak a copy of the > original reactor just enuf to make it different and a new patent can > be filed. Patent permutations are likely to start happening at > blinding speeds. As Jed has already eloquently expressed, even if it > might seem insulting at first glance the truth of the matter is that > collecting 1% of a trillion dollar business is nothing to sneeze at! > > Granted, and in respectful deference to Mr. Lawrence's continued > concerns about recent proceedings, they do not strike me personally as > the actions of a scam operation in progress. It strikes me more as > corporate maneuvering to position themselves at the top of the pecking > order. (We are, after all, a very competitive species.) Yes, I realize > I could still turn out to be amazingly wrong on most if not all > points, but I'm not inclined to think so based on what I've gleaned > between the lines so far. > > Regards > Steven Vincent Johnson > www.OrionWorks.com > www.zazzle.com/orionworks > >
