Sigh. The quality the report leaves me with the impression that it is an 
elaborate hoax. Perhaps they will come clean on April 1st when they unveil the 
1 
MW  version?

Harry


>
>From: Stephen A. Lawrence <[email protected]>
>To: [email protected]
>Sent: Mon, January 24, 2011 1:46:40 PM
>Subject: Re: [Vo]:Levi report uploaded
>
>
>
>On 01/24/2011 01:27 PM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote: 
>Wait a minute:
>>
>>My eyeballs scanned the following paragraph:
>>
>>Page 6:
>>
>>Conclusions
>>
>>The amount of power and energy produce during both tests is indeed
>>impressive and, TOGETHER WITH THE SELF SUSTAINING STATE REACH DURING
>>[caps mine] [TEST 1] could be an indication that the system is working
>>as a new type of energy source. The short duration of the test
>>suggests that is important to make more long and complete experiments.
>>An appropriate scientific program will be drawn up.
>>
>>...
>>
>>Ah yes, "...could be an indication..."
>>
>>Not unexpectedly, the information strikes me as being coached in super
>>conservative scientific -speak, not that I'm complaining. Under the
>>circumstances I'd probably do the same thing too!
>>
Personally, under the circumstances, I'd have included  the data in the report.

If nothing else I'd have included scales on the graphs, and I'd have 
photographed the monitor straight-on, with the camera horizontal, and I'd have 
corrected the color, brightness, and barrel distortion afterwards so the graphs 
could actually be read.  (It's not hard -- it's what I've done in the past when 
presenting data, and heck, I'm just an amateur.)

The only graph in the paper I can see which has tic labels is the one for input 
power.   Incidentally, that appears as one graph in the paper, but it must have 
been constructed by pasting together parts of two other graphs, as Test1 and 
Test2 took place almost a month apart, yet the graph shows them as being just a 
few hours apart.

And I'd have made darn sure I didn't lose the temperature data from the second 
run.

(By the way, was "test2" the public demonstration, or do I have my dates 
confused?)



Regards
>Steven Vincent Johnson
>www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks    

Reply via email to