Well, not to get too far off the subject - but you probably heard of the
so-called Project Lucifer, which was kind of a silly conspiracy theory which
had arguable support from mystical texts.

 

There is the slight chance that the high winds of Saturn are already
associated with some kind of LENR, which itself might be related to thermal
stress at high pressure, in combination with high electric fields. For all
we know, these outer planet might have larger amounts of helium3 and
deuterium that realized.  :-)

 

Talk about proving cold-fusion from afar! 

 

 

From: David Jonsson 

 

Hi

 

Nice comments.

 

It will probably take months until I have reach as far as to answer your
questions

 

On Jupiter there are complex winds, some faster and some slower than the
planet.

 

I would gladly treat the winds on any planet but there is too little data on
them. I need pressure and temperature dependency on depth in the atmosphere.
Maybe it can be derived. It will be very interesting to see inf the normal
stress component significantly alters the scale height (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scale_height ) H = kT/Mg of the atmosphere.
That would be a real breakthrough. g in that formula is dependent on thermal
motion as show in the Physicsforum thread. Another thing is that not very
deep down in the atmosphere it will be so hot that there will be ionization
with free electrons. Electrons are so lightweight and fast that the thermal
effect on their centripetal acceleration makes their g value very much lower
than the ions and thus produce an electric field directed inwards. I find it
very interesting and I am surprised it hasn't been investigated. I have read
something about an electric field on Jupiter or Saturn. On the Earth it is
varying over the day between 80-120 V/m. I wonder how much the thermal
stress contributes to that.

 

David


David Jonsson, Sweden, phone callto:+46703000370




On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote:

Interesting paper David,

 

This comment is more about the scope and/or open-endedness of the paper. 

 

As I am reading though it, I am hoping to find any suggestions towards the
intriguing question posed in the opening - that the winds on Saturn are
incredibly fast and blow 500 m/s faster than the planet. Why or how did your
original model answer that? Is there an electrical component? Also there is
the old problem - does such a fast wind blow only in one direction? That one
has possibly been answered - it blows both ways. How could this not create
more stress, not less?

 

Obviously you did not set out to answer these questions about the winds on
Saturn, but I am left asking - if there is anything new that we know before
? It might be wise to limit the reader's expectations at the start.

 

Jones

 

From: David Jonsson [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2011 6:33 AM
To: vortex-l
Subject: [Vo]:More change regarding rotating gas: less shear and new normal
stress variations

 

I had to adjust my calculations again because of failures of the previous
calculations. It is significantly simplified and the torque effect is now
much lower than in previous versions. I can no longer explain the Venusian
winds.

 

One thing I still wonder about is how an equilibrium could be established.
Since no net rotation acceleration is taking place in the gas some counter
shear stress is taking place and I wonder if the shear stress from the
observed shear flow could be balancing the effect. This explains why the
flow is contrary to derived shear. On the other hand that shear is
horizontal and the derived stress is vertical.

 

I ask you to visit 

http://arxiv.org/abs/1012.1381

and tell me what you think, Critique is appreciated as well as affirmations.

 

I also have some idea on how to calculate on liquid and solid matter and on
plasma. The funny thin is that my initial estimate on plasma is that
electromagnetic fields can establish due to the effect.

 

I also plan to include normal stress variations that are also due to thermal
motion into the same article. You can find the basis of that part on
Physicsforum: 

http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=464979

Read it from bottom and up to get the corrections first. 

 

David


David Jonsson, Sweden, phone callto:+46703000370

 

Reply via email to