I have tried to give him complete information and I am sure he has aome sources we have not acces to. Good information = smart questions. The question re weat steam was not so but became an unkillable meme till the water cooling test. Negative (de facto zero) informaton is sometimes very valuable as in this problem: http://www.brainj.net/puzzle.php?id=4hats It is increasingly possible that the absence of reaction (or of agression) from Bob is such a (good) sign. Peter
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 9:53 PM, Mark Iverson <[email protected]> wrote: > Not interesting yet... > > I'll bet he's watching it very closely, though, and will likely mention > something when he's had more time to ask the same questions as we have > here.... of course, even though he might ask himself the same questions, > doesn't mean his rational mind will overcome his pathological slepticism and > come to the rational conclusions that "the collective' has!! :-) > > -Mark > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Peter Gluck [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Saturday, February 26, 2011 11:24 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:friendly exchange of ideas > > Saturday- What's New was published and Dr Park has not mentioned > the Bologna test. Interesting. Or more than interesting? > > > On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 5:57 AM, Terry Blanton <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Not so >> > curious about what he will write- that's his personal problem >> > of prestige management. I feel much empathy for him, I am >> > not an authorithy so I be very open and sincere. >> >> "Love your enemy." >> >> Peter, you are a true human being. >> >> T >> >> > > > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > Cluj, Romania > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
