Jones Beene wrote:

It looks at first glance like Mr Blakeslee makes a gross error in his
reporting of the earlier Focardi paper, where the excess heat run of 300
days is 600 MJ not 250 MWh.

I think he meant 600 MJ = 166 kWh, and 900 MJ = 250 kWh. This is from the paper:

http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/FocardiSlargeexces.pdf

I sent him the correction.

- Jed

Reply via email to