Good points - especially the CETI analogy. That could have been the original case of getting lucky, and then losing the magic...
-----Original Message----- From: Dennis Just a personal view....... having seen some of these things played out..... it could be that he doesn't know how it works. It may be very much material dependent and he has but a little of "the good stuff" left and doesn't know why batch 3 and 4 (pick some numbers) work and the new ones don't. Now he is trying to make smaller ones to conserve the material and save face. It is interesting to notice that the devices in the Swedish report showed a lot of Cu oxide black but the other fittings where new and shinny. Perhaps they were old ones or some taken out of service. Anyway, it is hard to see how you could get that much oxide on them if water was flowing in the pipes. Notice the fittings on the Cu parts were not altered enough to knock of the oxide but the mounts and connectors were all new. I know that with CETI, they thought they had it, and then when the good batches ran out......... I just know that active materials may be hard to acquire in multiple batches. There is just something at the atomic level that is required and we just don't know how to make it consistently. Dennis -------------------------------------------------- From: "Jones Beene" > -----Original Message----- > From: Terry Blanton > >> So what is his endgame? > > Well, if he really has made a great discovery, as we all hope - then the > latest stunt with the small ghetto-quality versions is probably to protect > the secret for as long as possible by misdirection. > > That would be by showing old early efforts which do not work well, for the > purpose of keeping replicators from trying a full-liter volume reactor, > which would be the critical-mass (of something) threshold. We have only > his > word these work at all. > > IOW - he does not understand what is going on - and thinks that either it > might be covered by Randell Mills IP, or that someone else might discover > the precise M.O. and deprive him of full worth. > > That is one of several scenarios which could be the motivation for all of > the half-truths, assuming that the large device does function as in the > demo. > > He may have realized now that he "gave away too much" a few months back. > Geeze, he may even read vortex. > > OTOH - If he is a total scam artist, and that is certainly not ruled out - > then he has probably lined up one or two especially wealthy investors, > whom > he will fleece. > > For instance, did you see the Spike Lee film 'Inside Man'? > > ... where there was a bank robbery, or was there? Nothing appears missing. > The investigation is dropped as there is no apparent theft. And the single > rich victim (the mark) cannot complain, because he was once the worst kind > of villain and has to protect that secret. Rossi, who has already been > convicted of tax evasion and has Swiss connections, may have located such > a > mark, one with lots of untaxed wealth, and who is seeking legitimacy in a > real business venture. Geeze it could be Berlusconi for all we know. > > Heck, if nothing else - this makes a provocative story or screenplay, no? > > Having spent a few months of time on trying to understand Rossi and E-Cat, > hundreds of hours really - believing it will surely save the world from > the > evils of the Big Oil/OPEC alliance, just like Mills failed to do a decade > ago > - maybe I can salvage something out of all the effort, and should start > that > screenplay soon ... just in case. > > Jones > > > >
