On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 6:13 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > Micrograms, actually. Perhaps you only need a few atoms thickness on the > nickel surface.
Well, that could certainly explain the Patterson fiasco. Call Motorola! T
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 6:13 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > Micrograms, actually. Perhaps you only need a few atoms thickness on the > nickel surface.
Well, that could certainly explain the Patterson fiasco. Call Motorola! T