Not so much, I think- more an "Sphinx without a secret"- I think he has found a very good method to activate nanometric Nickel- this method can include additives or not- they can be called a catalyst or not- it is a problem of definition. It is about a great density of NAE. The problem is how to be new and different from the prior expertise. To make a patentable difference. In part real, in part imaginary. He has ststed that his technology is essentially different from the prior technology; this can be true or not but in both cases generates problems.
As regarding isotope enrichment- please be aware that this is made only with Ni in a fluid state is costly and cannot be made with great quantities of metals- hundreds of grams, kilos. Better to ignore it. On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]>wrote: > Stephen A. Lawrence <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> But then, how come the sample sent to the lab in Sweden wasn't enriched? >> They tested the nickel and the copper and both appeared to be "natural". >> Was it a bogus sample? >> > > Who knows. Maybe he uses enriched samples sometimes and sometimes not. > Maybe he thinks it is being enriched, but that is because his mass > spectroscopy is inadequate. > > Rossi is a Man of Mystery. > > - Jed > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
