Horace,
Not problematic at all! That is exactly what my theory predicts. The energy deficits of deflation fusion prevent isomers form forming and thus (large) gammas. The combination of strong force reactions with large energy deficits followed by weak reactions when feasible makes for non-radioactive products too. Well, yes the energy production involving zero point energy is the best part about it for me! but the problem is the following weak reaction and the fast electron. How does a fast electron not produce gamma radiation? Is there an example of beta decay that does not register on a sensitive meter? My unsophisticated meters pick up beta decays from bananas! And I've noticed that several vorticians including Robin seem to overlook that a fast electron (from a deep hydrino reaction) should easily show up. Nothing in the form of detectable radiation (notwithstanding Rossi's assurance to the contrary) has turned up in sophisticated testing in Bologna AFAIK. If you look at Levi's CV and papers (sparse to being with) - he is an instrument specialist ! We can pretty much be certain that there were no appreciable weak force reactions in that demo since his probe was under the shielding. Perhaps I missed something, which is not hard to do with so much information coming in from all directions in 2011. Having said that, I think you are definitely on the right track. I will only be a matter of time before Larsen incorporates what he likes about it into his theory, if he hasn't already :-) Jones
