Thank you for your insight.
“If there is anything nuclear, and the metal isotope distribution is natural – then it is almost a guarantee that it must involve only hydrogen, no metal.” This is probable true. Would it not be ironic that the fusion/fission of just hydrogen produces nickel and copper without nickel entering into the reaction in any way, contray to what Rossi thinks? I am surprised that you are not well versed in the work of the LENR team: Dr H. Hora, and Dr. G.H. Miley. From a large volume of LENR experimental results, Dr Miley has developed a theory of LENR transmutation that predicts this natural abundance of isotopes around the magic atomic numbers of 2, 6, 14, 28, 50, 82, 126… Now, 28 is the atomic number of nickel, and the fission of the super atom formed during the fusion of many atoms will result in an array of elements that cluster around peaks defined by these magic numbers: 2 – helium 6 – carbon 14 – silicon 28 – nickel There will be many transmutation events producing nickel whose atomic number (A) is 28, but also some lesser amounts producing copper (A = 29) and even less zinc (A = 30). On the other side of the Boltzmann quark distribution described by the expression N(Z) = N’ exp (-Z/Z’) where Z’ = 10. You get more cobalt (A = 27) and even less Iron (A = 26). All these elements have been seen is Rossi ash. Around the lower order magic numbers carbon (A = 6) and silicon(A = 14) are clustered the following elements: 8 - Oxygen 9 - Fluorine(captured to form fluorides) 10 - Neon (outgased ?) 11 - Sodium 12 - Magnesium 13- Silicon (mentioned as ash) 14 - Phosphorus 15 – Sulfur (mentioned as ash) 16 – Chlorine (mentioned as ash) 17 – Argon (outgased ?) 18 – Potassium (mentioned as ash) 19 – Calcium (mentioned as ash) A further consequence of the LENR evaluation leads to the ratios R (n) (n = 1, 2, 3…) of the Boltzmann probabilities, namely R (n) = 3n. This suggests a threefold property of stable configurations at magic numbers in nuclei, consistent with a quark property. It is as if a large amount of hydrogen atoms form into a cold plasma go into a quantum mechanical blender and turned into a coherent quark soup. In an instant, when the quark soup fissions, this LENR process produces atoms whose isotopic character is the same as exists in nature. This is to be expected since the inherent properties of quarks define what comes out of the fission process. This LENR fission process is done so gently and at such low energies that no unstable (radioactive) elements are produced. Emitted X-rays energies correspond to the speeds of these various fission fragments rebounding away from the center of this fission process. On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Mattia Rizzi <[email protected]>wrote: > >When the Reaction first begins, the isotopic ratios could be random > > No. > Isotopic ratio from natural background is constant, with low deviation. > > >in the same way that a few samples among a population will produce widely > varied statistics. > > Check how many atoms (and isotopes) are contained inside 1g of matter. > > > the isotopic ratios begin to resolve around a natural distribution > > This is non-sense. A nuclear reaction should produce non-natural > distributions. > > *From:* Axil Axil <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Friday, April 15, 2011 9:42 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:About isotopic ratio on spent fuel (E-Cat) > > Could another variable be the amount of time that the ash spends in the > Rossi reactor? When the Reaction first begins, the isotopic ratios could be > random in the same way that a few samples among a population will produce > widely varied statistics. > > > > But when the reactor runs for a very long time, the isotopic ratios begin > to resolve around a natural distribution, much like a large statistical > sample will produce a reliable description of a large population. > > > > The isotopic ratios might all depend (as a function of time) on the way the > ash was produced. > > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]>wrote: > >> The simplest explanation of this contradiction is that "they" do not want >> to tell what the isotopic ratio of Cu is- and will not tell till the >> scientific report of the Bologna Univ. is published. >> Unnnatural, natural? The first is a mistery at the 2nd power, the other a >> mystery at the 3rd power. >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Mattia Rizzi <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> On january 2010 "A new energy source" they say that the isotpic ratio >>> of Cu is nearly natural background. >>> Source: http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/FocardiSanewenergy.pdf >>> On March 2010 they correct it and say that isotopic ration of Cu is >>> different from background. >>> >>> http://www.nyteknik.se/incoming/article3080659.ece/BINARY/Rossi-Focardi_paper.pdf >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Dr. Peter Gluck >> Cluj, Romania >> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >> >> >
