I wrote:
> Your assertions make no sense. You seem to think that the e-Cat should have > melted a ton of steel. How can it do that if all of the heat is being > carried off in the form of hot water? > A nuclear reactor could probably melt a ton of steel in a few seconds, but it heats water instead. Except, unfortunately, at Three Mile Island and Fukushima. Over the course of a month or so, my home water heater could melt a lot of steel too (if you could hold the heat in a well insulated container), but I use it for hot baths instead. At around 40°C as it happens. This discussion is surrealistic. What sense does it make to say that a machine that heats water could have or should have melted steel instead?!? You can't do both. - Jed
