Dear Jones, I see not deep similarities between the Rossi and the BLP processes Some logical flaw here.... Quite different approaches to energy generation, I think. Rossi has to control weel the intensity, obtain even better reoroducbility (eliminate start -up peaks), assure long term uniformity of performances, find a more engineer like method for scale up than combining many units,eliminate any type of accidents. Not easy
Peter On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear Peter, > > > > I wish I had enough information to answer what you ask. You probably know > more than I do anyway, with your BLP connection. > > > > - Intensity – this is almost too high to be physical even at the 16 > kW level, let alone 130 kW. He is riding a knife edge. Look how much larger > Mills’ 50 kW reactor is. > > - Reproducibility - is probably less of a problem than > controllability. The first independent replication of Mills that I know of > (Cockeram) went to total meltdown. > > - Continuity – this seems to be the big advance of Rossi. He > converts Mills’ batch process into continuous > > - Safety – If controllability is an issue, then a hydrogen fire will > not be unexpected > > - Scale-up – You analysis of this could be correct. Maybe he has > scaled up too far already in an attempt to get the continuity. > > > > My hope for the future of the technology is that Randell Mills (another > potential Messiah figure) will burst onto the scene in the coming months in > a dramatic and meaningful way; and then between him, Rossi and a few others, > all of the open questions will be answered will before OPEC buys Defkalion > and/or whatever is the worst conspiracy (that anyone can imagine) takes > place. There are literally trillions of dollars/euros at stake in this. > > > > Of all Rossi’s problems, the patent situation seems to be the most grim if > he can get through this year and the October demo. Don’t forget that in > addition to Mills IP, we know that Mitchell Swartz and several others in > Japan, Italy, India and elsewhere have been reporting gains in NiH for > years, and Mitchell for one has patent applications in place (that most > likely have priority over Rossi). How many others are out there ?? > > > > It would not surprise me at all if the only thing Rossi can patent now (as > the Gianni-come-lately, so to speak) is his **continuity process**, but > then the irony is that he might need to get a basic license from whomever > has priority in NiH gas-phase itself. However, the Thermacore gas phase work > may make that issue moot. Most people do not realize how successful > Thermacore was in gas phase in the DARPA contract, and DARPA did not patent > it when they had the chance - so the basic process could be wide open !! > > > > If not, that person with priority, if they realize their good fortune - is > probably sitting back and smiling at all of this, as we speak. > > > > Jones > > > > > > *From:* Peter Gluck > > > > Dear Jones, > > > > In your opinion, what exactly are Rossi's problems? > > Perhaps you could use the 5 criteria of an energy source: > > - intensity, > > - reproducibility and controllability; > > - continuity, > > - safety; > > - scale-up > > > > Add to these his intellectual property problems- not only patenting here. > > How do you think about these? > > Thanks! > > Peter > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > > *From:* Stephen A. Lawrence > > Ø Jones, who put such an angry bee in your bonnet over Rossi? > > There is no anger – just disappointment that so many are jumping to > hyperbolic conclusions which are not justified by the record. And > disappointment that technology so potentially valuable [to society] goes > misunderstood by those chosen by Rossi, and that it could succumb to greed > [OPEC for instance] if it is not fully understood, before long. > > How many times do I have to say it - the NiH reaction is gainful ! > > The is no doubt it is gainful – I have seen this recently first hand but > that does not mean that it is even close to what Rothwell wants to believe > it is. In my opinion Rossi does not have a clue and sadly, neither does > Focardi. Aren’t we all entitled to express that? > > > > You swallowed all the nonsense spewed out by *Doctor* Stiffler, quite > some time back > > Not really. I reported Stiffler’s results as they were presented – and he > was not hiding anything in a “black box,” to his credit. I also reported the > problems when they were found, which is where Jed has a blind eye – with > Rossi. > > > Jed's being a whole lot more reasonable about this than you were about > the Stiffler "miracle", as far as I can see. > > You really believe that 130,000 watt in 15 minutes to a reactor will not > raise copious steam ? That ‘miracle’ puts Stiffler’s few watts from ground > to shame. > > The point of this being that many creative inventors (artists writers > poets etc) are often cranky and weird. That should not be news to anyone. If > they are not honest, that adds to the problem when the technology can > essentially serve to “save our way of life” and when this happens, and when > Rossi has hidden the facts about the $2 million+ he has received from DoE > since 2000 to get to where he is now, he should be exposed for that. US > taxpayers OWN a stake in this and it will shortly come out as FIA papers > have been filed. > > BTW – Stiffler was NOT hiding the ground looping problem, and continues to > try to push it to the limits. I have not talked to him in years but he posts > his results to YouTube. Recently it appears he has been able to get a > surprising amount of voltage and LED light emission from only a ground > connection: > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TXYY7TqS380 > > Can you do anything close to that? If nothing else, the electricity grid > suppliers of the world should take note of whatever is going on here. > Needless to say they will be taking note of Rossi even if the COP in Sweden > turns out to be 10 (my guess) instead of Rothwell’s 1000+. > > Jones > > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com > > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
