The water may need to be preheated to give the reactor a chance to warm up.
Without the preheating, the reactor won't have enough heat to reach a
self-sustaining reaction.

harry

>
>From: Axil Axil <[email protected]>
>To: [email protected]
>Sent: Thu, April 21, 2011 7:32:23 PM
>Subject: Re: [Vo]:Strange position of heater in mini-Rossi device
>
>
>http://www.nyteknik.se/incoming/article3144960.ece/BINARY/Download+the+repor
>t+by+Kullander+and+Ess%C3%A9n+%28pdf%29.
> 
>Water is in the copper pipes.
> 
>The reaction kicks off when the water temperature hits 60C. This must be the 
>same for the outside reactor structure.
> 
>This fact does not defeat the basic logic of the external heater premise.
>
>
>On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>I wrote:
>>
>>
>>I suppose you could not use it for this purpose if the water is flowing.
>
>
>>For that matter, I suppose the whole problem vanishes if we assume they only 
>>use 
>>the heater when the water is not flowing. No details of the operational 
>>procedures have been released. For all we know, they turn off the flow while 
>>"firing up" the cell.
>>
>>
>>They did tell me they test the flow calorimetry before turning on the cell. 
>>That 
>>is to say, they make sure the inlet and outlet temperatures are the same. 
>>That 
>>does not mean they do not momentarily turn off the flow while starting up the 
>>cell.
>>
>>
>>If that is how they do it, the configuration could just as easily be a cell 
>>inside, with the water normally flowing around it. Not a torus. When the 
>>outside 
>>jacket is drained, there is an air gap between the copper and stainless steel 
>>cell. I think heat from the heater would reach the cell. Or, as Axil 
>>suggests, 
>>the outside heater could serve as a blanket while the inside heater does most 
>>of 
>>the work.
>>
>>
>>The only problem arises when you suppose the water is flowing the whole time, 
>>because that would carry off the heat from the outside heater, and prevent it 
>>from heating the inside cell.
>>
>>
>>- Jed
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to