Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote:
> It must have been lost in cyberspace for a day. > > > > In any event, you have not come up with an effective response – one that > does not involve something Rossi ‘said’ … > Actually, it involves: 1. What Rossi said. 2. What Levi et al. observed on the outside of the cell. 3. What Levi et al. will see soon when they open the cell -- i.e. it would strange for Rossi to lie about something that will soon be revealed as a lie. What's the point? That's a lot more than taking Rossi's word for it. But let's drop the subject. - Jed
