Hi Jones, >> Yeah, yeah, we know what the nuclear fizicists will say on >> the matter. >> >> What do they know. ;-)
> Well that's it, isn't it ... what do the experts know? Of > course, one can throw all of nuclear physics out the door, > but why? I'm certainly not arguing that we throw present knowledge of nuclear physics out the door. Unfortunately, I don't believe I've made myself sufficiently clear on this point. > Ask yourself "why do I want so badly for this to be nuclear?" I don't. I don't know if it's nuclear, transmutation, Memorex, or some other interesting combination of all three. ;-) > "Do I want it to be nuclear so badly that I will throw out > - not only all of nuclear physics, but common sense and logic > as well?" > > "What do I gain by alienating most of science to blindly insist > that it is nuclear, when there is no evidence for that ?" Again, just to clear on this point. It certainly does not serve me to possess an invested interest nor an egotistical need to believe that the Rossi effect is a nuclear process. All I care about is making sure we verify as accurately as possible whether the heat is a genuine phenomenon, or not. Speaking of egos, hopefully I'm not egotistically invested in having to believe that nuclear physicists have it all figured out either. I doubt they do. Regards Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
