Jones Beene wrote:
Perhaps it would have been best to call NASAs effort an "experiment which is similar to the Mills/Thermacore/Focardi/Piantelli/Rossi line of experiments using nickel nanomaterials and catalysts (which are possibly unique) and somewhat 'like Rossi' but not identical" - but that characterization is a bit burdensome for all concerned. Obviously Bushnell is not in direct collaboration with Rossi. Should I have made that clear?
I did not read the EVworld article behind the paywall. Did Bushnell say they will use nanomaterial? If so, this is more of a Rossi replication than any other kind of replication. It is sometimes hard to know whether to call a given experiment a "replication" since people do stuff far removed from the original, yet they still call it a replication.
- Jed
