Here are some recent comments from the blog. These are not particularly important but I went to the trouble to Google-translate one, so I thought I'd share them:
Claudio May 4th, 2011 at 1:36 AM Dear Mr. Andrea Rossi, this morning I watched on the Italian television the special regarding the E-Cat. Let me tell you that I disagree the opinion that the report was against you. The journalist does the journalist. It was normal that he made an investigation in your past. In the tail of the special we can see scientists speak about your invention as an important discover. So I don’t consider this as the “mud machine was starting”. In the interview you say “I made some mistakes”… My father said (and not only him): only who doesn’t work don’t make mistakes. Salutations, Claudio Andrea Rossi May 4th, 2011 at 2:59 AM http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=488&cpage=1#comment-36678 Dear Mr Claudio: The journalist has been uncorrect because he has taken the chance of my present work to repeat the mud of 20 years ago. He ignored my defense: correctness wants that you listen both parties, if there is a litigation. In any case I take advantage of your precious comment to remember that my version ( which I tried to make as objective as possible) about my past are in http://www.ingandrearossi.com Warm Regards, A.R. Gherardo May 4th, 2011 at 3:02 PM Dott.Rossi, seguo da qualche mese la vs invenzione e spero proprio che sia quello che promette e che riesca a rivoluzionare in pieno il settore energetico (domestico in primis). Le chiedo alcuni chiarimenti non tecnici: 1) la produzione avverrà anche in Italia? Anche se è una terra ingrata è la nostra terra, non scappi all’estero e in quota parte ci aiuti a risorgere da questo guano politico-morale-economico. 2) una delle illusioni che mi ero fatto era una “caldaia” da mettere a casa che funziona per tanti anni (5-10) ma poi sento 6 mesi e poi ricarica/sostituzione. E’ un motivo commerciale o tecnico? Ci guadagni, il giusto, magari anche un po’ oltre, ma si ispiri anche ai principi di equità. 3) c’e’ una speranza concreta per un cubo energetico casalingo che ci dia acqua calda ed energia elettrica con conversione diretta? 4) 300 elementi per 1 MW… mi fa pensare che non sia la produzione di massa la killer application ma la produzione distribuita. Corretto? 5) 1200-2000€/kW… sembra tantino mi puo’ dire quale sarebbe il ROI del cittadino acquirente? 6) quando sarà acquistabile da privati? Continui a lavorare a questa alternativa fantastica, per la gloria, per i soldi e per il futuro dell’uomo. Un grazie per le sue risposte. Buon lavoro e in bocca al lupo! Gherardo GOOGLE TRANSLATE: Dott.Rossi, I follow a few months vs. the invention and hopefully that is what it says and who successfully revolutionize the energy sector in full (Primarily domestic). I ask some technical explanations: 1) the production will take place in Italy? Although it is an ungrateful land is our land, does not escape abroad and help us share to rise by This guano political, moral and economic. 2) one of the illusions that I had done was a "Boiler" to place at home that works for many years (5-10) but then I feel 6 months and then charge or replacement. It 's a reason commercial or technical? We earn the right, maybe a little ' beyond, but also draw on the principles of equity. 3) there is' a real hope for a cube energy home to give us hot water and electricity with direct conversion? 4) 300 parts per 1 MW ... makes me think that it is not the mass production but the killer application distributed generation. Correct? 5) 1200-2000 € / kW bit ... it seems I can 'say what ROI would be the buyer of the citizen? 6) when it will be bought by private individuals? Continue to work with this fantastic alternative, for the glory, for the money and the future of man. Thanks for your replies. Good work and in the mouth luck! Gherardo ROSSI'S RESPONSE (which was in English): Andrea Rossi May 4th, 2011 at 3:12 PM Dear Gherardo: 1- I will not work in Italy, at least for the first 10 years 2- a recharge every 6 months is necessary, is less frequent than usual technologies and very cheap. 3- possibly 4- yes 5- is the same price of standard technologies, but with a fuel price reduced by orders of magnitude 6- within the year Warm Regards, A.R. Claudio May 4th, 2011 at 12:36 PM Hi, Andrea I already know the facts regarding you. I visited and read your site. I believe in you. But, follow my advice, give as soon as possible an E-Cat to the Sveden university to make some indipendent tests. Before the “mud machine” starts. A friend, Claudio Andrea Rossi May 4th, 2011 at 3:15 PM http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=488&cpage=2#comment-36776 Dear Claudio: we will make further research with Uppsala University and Bologna University, for R&D. The mud doesn’t worry me, we will start the delivery of our plants this year and the market will be the sole judge. About the Italian bullshit, no problem: we will not work in Italy for the next years. Warm regards, A.R. - Jed
