Alan sez: >> > Is it too much to ask for ONE TEST in which EVERYTHING is done >> > correctly: >> Yes, > > <snark=ON> > > Sorry, I thought vortex was a scientific list, not a religious one. > > <snark=OFF> >
Hi Alan, Jed has already posted a few suggestions on the matter of getting what you think you deserve in life. You seem to have come to a conclusion that my previous pithy response, (which I freely admit was intentionally crafted at your expense), is "religious" in nature. How you arrived at such conclusion mystifies me, but no matter. FWIW, I occasionally develop software. It's been my experience that 1 percent of software development involves highly inspirational POC (Proof of concept) work. Invariably, inspirational POC work tends to be followed by 99 percent of not so inspirational tedious labor that focuses on how to make one's POC application (one's pride-and-joy) idiot proof. Never EVER underestimate the capacity of software users to find ways to wreak havoc with one's pride-and-joy, especially as they go about "testing" and "analyzing" its merits. I have a suspicion mechanical engineering inventors must endure similar trials and tribulations, including Rossi & Co. Regards Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
