I'm restructuring my paper a bit, and completing my write-up of the April test.
Looking at :
http://www.nyteknik.se/incoming/article3166578.ece/BINARY/original/Test_1_april+058_600px.jpg
I'm being too generous in my volume calculations for all the mini-eCat tests.
a) That board is very thick -- and made of two boards stuck together.
Plenty of room in there to hide a large layer of NiCad batteries.
b) Or room to make some kind of connection to the three "naked"
eCats. They could contain batteries, OR could be hydrogen and oxygen
pressurized containers. Hmmm ... one Hydrogen and Two oxygen ... does
that ratio sound familiar?
For batteries, the securing bolts (two!) provide a conducting path
down into the board (insulating), where there's plenty of room for wires.
For H/O2 -- the securing bolts are large enough to drill a hole down
the center, run tubes through the board and up into the "test" eCAT.
- - - - -
Also, the April CoP ratio 8.5, 7.3 is LOWER than the theoretical
limit for a heat pump, and should therefore be tested against.
And just to remind you of my motivation in all this :
a) I can say I BELIEVE the eCat is real.
OR
b) I can conclude from the published results and media reports that
the eCAT is PROBABLY real.
(preponderance of evidence)
OR
c) I can PROVE from the published results that the eCAT is real
(beyond all reasonable doubt, and even big categories of
unreasonable doubt).
