If 500 cc volume were true...
A cubed shaped reaction chamber with a volume of 50 CC that can produce a 130,000 kw heat spike would radiate at a power of 1 kilowatt per square centimeter give or take. The absolute black body radiation temperature of such a vessel would be 17,636,684,303 degrees. On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > Well I can see that Rothwell is in now full retreat - since he has > started to distort the facts to conform with his prior erroneous assumptions > – rather than doing the basic reality check and admitting that he could be > wrong. > > > > There is no “50 CC” which is relevant. There is no factuality in the > Rothwell appraisal of what others saw, or what he has heard that they saw – > and it simply does not add up that Rossi would be hiding the insides of a > reactor that is no longer the one to be used in October. If we look at facts > only, there is no evidence of a larger device. > > > > Ockham sez: only one size E-Cat. > > > > The “50 CC” is pure BS and typical rossi-speak. The cm scale is shown in > the images, and the smallest bulge alone is at least five time more, and > there is every ‘logical’ reason to suspect, given Rossi’s abundant history > of disinformation - that there always was only one size - and that the > reason for why the coverup remains in place is to disguise Levi’s gross > measurement errors in the ‘Focardi tribute’ (the wet steam error) which was > compounded by a further error in February (the misplaced thermocouple > error). > > > > It is clear now that both of these tests were juvenile efforts at > calorimetry – below high school standards - and thankfully the Swedes have > at least given us something closer to the truth – but as Mats admits, they > are not there yet > > > > Jones > > > > > > > > *From:* Jed Rothwell > > > > If one trusted observer (namely Levi) were to have been given a quick peek > inside the original device, back in January > > > > 1. It was not a "quick peek." Who told you it was quick? > > > > 2. Others saw it too. > > > > 3. What difference does it make whether it was January, February, March or > April? The size does not change with the season. > > > > 4. Anyone can tell at a glance the difference between an object roughly 1 L > and one that is 50 ml. Even a quick peek would be enough. > > > > Look, there is not a shred of evidence for this idea of yours. Not one > person has said one thing that indicates this might be the case. I do not > know how or why this idee fixe entered your mind, but it is incorrect. > > > > - Jed > > >
