Could a copper reactor tube even be able to handle the heat (1100F?) and pressure (25 bar?) of H2?
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > Two messages are coming through loud and clear wrt the “big picture”… > > > > First - Rossi is getting horrendous legal advice, and the beneficiary of > that is the “rest of us”. This is no doubt the worst patent application in > memory and it follows a very good one that Rossi got when LTI paid the bill > (extremely competent, actually, which is why I am calling this one nothing > more than a joke). > > > > IOW – with an unenforceable patent as his only protection –junk really, > then Rossi will go down as a “great inventor” with big bucks in the bank > from the Greeks - and at the same time US consumers will be able to buy > these things from China for a very low cost, as space heaters, since they > are non-nuclear. > > > > Hot water and winter heating consume vast amounts of coal, the dirtiest > fuel - so even if this baby does not work on a steam cycle – we have > effectively lowered fossil fuel consumption by up to 30%. That will get back > to lower oil costs, in the end. It is the best of all scenarios. > > > > And the E-Cat might work on an organic vapor cycle (i.e. ammonia) instead > of steam, anyway. > > > > What’s not to like about that? > > > > Jones > > > > > > *From:* Roarty, Francis X > > > > So Rossi let us go ahead and think the cu was outside the SS reactor while > it was actually the sealed inner reactor filled with Ni powder and a > resistive heater. Water flows around the copper reactor inside a SS jacket. > The SS is a jacket not a reactor! See patent & drawing Jed just uploaded : > > http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RossiAmethodandaa.pdf > > http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RossiAmethodandaa.pdf > > >
